[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAE9FiQV=G0huaJYtTEacctzwHTKCS+xK54QWLn3P3e0kz_Dg2Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2012 10:29:40 -0800
From: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>
Cc: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>, x86 <x86@...nel.org>,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...el.com>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/23] pci, dmar: Update dmar units devices list during hotplug
On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 9:37 AM, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 10:32 AM, Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org> wrote:
>> On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 9:25 AM, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Well, it looks like you can change both save_dev_dmaru() *and*
>>> get_dev_dmaru() to take a struct pci_dev *. I assumed that would be
>>> obvious.
>>
>> no.
>>
>> get_dev_dmaru() have to use bus/devfn to retrieve the dev pointer.
>
> I expected something like that, but all I see in the patch is this:
>
> +static void restore_dev_to_drhd(struct pci_dev *dev)
> + drhd = get_dev_dmaru(pci_domain_nr(dev->bus), dev->bus->number,
> + dev->devfn, &i, &saved_dev_drhd_list);
>
> +static void restore_dev_to_atsr(struct pci_dev *dev)
> + atsr = get_dev_dmaru(pci_domain_nr(dev->bus), dev->bus->number,
> + dev->devfn, &i, &saved_dev_atsr_list);
>
> In both those cases, you have the struct pci_dev *.
OK, i missed that. will update that accordingly.
Thanks
Yinghai
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists