Message-ID: <4F5A4FDE.1030305@gmail.com>
Date:	Fri, 09 Mar 2012 10:45:50 -0800
From:	David Daney <ddaney.cavm@...il.com>
To:	Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>
CC:	David Daney <david.s.daney@...il.com>,
	Rob Herring <robherring2@...il.com>,
	David Daney <ddaney.cavm@...il.com>,
	"linux-mips@...ux-mips.org" <linux-mips@...ux-mips.org>,
	"ralf@...ux-mips.org" <ralf@...ux-mips.org>,
	"devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org" 
	<devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
	Rob Herring <rob.herring@...xeda.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 4/5] MIPS: Octeon: Setup irq_domains for interrupts.

On 03/08/2012 09:57 PM, Grant Likely wrote:
> On Sat, 03 Mar 2012 21:09:32 -0800, David Daney<david.s.daney@...il.com>  wrote:
>> On 03/03/2012 11:35 AM, Rob Herring wrote:
>>> On 03/02/2012 01:29 PM, David Daney wrote:
>>>> On 03/02/2012 11:07 AM, Grant Likely wrote:
>>>>> +static void __init octeon_irq_set_ciu_mapping(unsigned int irq,
>>>>> +                          unsigned int line,
>>>>> +                          unsigned int bit,
>>>>> +                          struct irq_domain *domain,
>>>>>                                struct irq_chip *chip,
>>>>>                                irq_flow_handler_t handler)
>>>>>      {
>>>>> +    struct irq_data *irqd;
>>>>>          union octeon_ciu_chip_data cd;
>>>>>
>>>>>          irq_set_chip_and_handler(irq, chip, handler);
>>>>> -
>>>>>          cd.l = 0;
>>>>>          cd.s.line = line;
>>>>>          cd.s.bit = bit;
>>>>>
>>>>>          irq_set_chip_data(irq, cd.p);
>>>>>          octeon_irq_ciu_to_irq[line][bit] = irq;
>>>>> +
>>>>> +    irqd = irq_get_irq_data(irq);
>>>>> +    irqd->hwirq = line<<     6 | bit;
>>>>> +    irqd->domain = domain;
>>>>>>> I think the domain code will set these.
>>>>>> It is my understanding that the domain code only does this for:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> o irq_domain_add_legacy()
>>>>>>
>>>>>> o irq_create_direct_mapping()
>>>>>>
>>>>>> o irq_create_mapping()
>>>>>>
>>>>>> We use none of those.  So I do it here.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If there is a better way, I am open to suggestions.
>>>>> irq_create_mapping is called by irq_create_of_mapping() which is
>>>>> in turn called by irq_of_parse_and-map().  irq_domain always
>>>>> manages the hwirq and domain values.  Driver code cannot manipulate
>>>>> them manually.
>>>>>
>>>> I really must be missing something.
>>>>
>>>> Given:
>>>>
>>>> 1) I must have a mapping between hwirq and irq that I control so that
>>>> non-OF code using the OCTEON_IRQ_* constants continues to work.
>>> Those defines are what you need to work to get rid of.
>>
>> We are not starting from a blank slate here.  There is a lot of in-tree
>> code using these symbols.  We cannot make them disappear with wishful
>> thinking.
>>
>> The first step is a switch to irq_domains using the existing mappings.
>>
>> After we do that, I have patches to transition some drivers to use the
>> OF mapping via irq_domains.  After those are merged, we can work toward
>> getting rid of OCTEON_IRQ_*.  But I think it must be the last step in
>> the process, not the first.
>>>
>>>> 2) irq_create_mapping() will allocate a random irq value if none is
>>>> already assigned to the hwirq.
>>>>
>>>> Therefore: To avoid having random irq values assigned, I must manually
>>>> assign them.
>>>>
>>> So you should be using legacy domain if you need to maintain fixed hwirq
>>> to linux irq numbers. "linear" is a bit confusing as it doesn't mean
>>> linear 1:1 irq number assignment, but linear search.
>>
>> My reading of Grant's code in linux-next directly contradicts this
>> statement.  There is no code in irqdomain.c, that I can see, that allows
>> me to have an arbitrary mapping of irq<-->  hwirq values.
>
> There are 4 kinds of mappings available; legacy, linear, radix and nomap.
>

Yes, I had discovered that.

> Ignore nomap and radix; you don't want them.
>
> legacy maps a contiguous range of hwirq numbers to a contiguous range of
> linux irq numbers.  To preserve the exising #define mappings but still add
> DT support, this is the one that you want.

This is precisely the point that you and Rob seem to have missed in the 
last three or four back-and-forths about this.

Probably I have not explained well enough why legacy will not work.

We have three different interrupt controllers (although only one is 
currently in-tree).  hwirq to irq mapping for them is more or less as 
follows:

irq                 hwirqCIU        hwirqCIU2      hwirqCIU3
----------------------------------------------------------------------
OCTEON_IRQ_USB0     56               81             934562
OCTEON_IRQ_TWSI     45              224             100543
OCTEON_IRQ_UART0    34              228               4572
.
.
.

Now what we notice here is that there is no possible 1:1 linearly 
increasing mapping possible for the irq and *all* three hwirq sets.  We 
want a single binary that contains support for all three interrupt 
controllers, so the OCTEON_IRQ_* values have to be the same for all 
three interrupt controllers.  Because of this, legacy mapping is 
*impossible*.

Since the possible ranges of the hwirq values is very large and quite 
sparse, probably the radix mapping will be required.

Also to support non-OF drivers and architecture specific code for the 
near future, I really think the existing IRQ values *must* be preserved.

Therefore, as I said above, we need a way for my SOC/board code to 
specify the mapping.

Perhaps we need to add an optional function to struct irq_domain_ops 
that would allow the default mapping to be overridden on a per 
irq_domain basis.

Otherwise, I think I will have to keep poking into the internal 
irq_domain data structures to get the mappings I want.

What do you think?

David Daney
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists