linux-kernel - Re: udelay minimum delay guarantee and maximum supported delay?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CA+55aFz5mt1LWDVVdPD3vsE4F1u8+Rz5j1fh69de0f5ae-cbNw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Fri, 9 Mar 2012 12:11:17 -0800
From:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc:	Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@...lan.co.uk>, x86@...nel.org,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Glauber Costa <gcosta@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: udelay minimum delay guarantee and maximum supported delay?

On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 11:55 AM, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> wrote:
>
> Make those variables explicitely u32 again, so this works for both 32
> and 64 bit.

Ack. Should I take this directly?

                          Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/