[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120309221302.GA17158@elte.hu>
Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2012 23:13:02 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...64.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, x86@...nel.org,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@....edu>,
Hidetoshi Seto <seto.hidetoshi@...fujitsu.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Mike Frysinger <vapier@...too.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: use enum instead of literals for trap values
* H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com> wrote:
> On 03/09/2012 10:52 AM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > I agree too, except where does "XCP" come from? Is it short for
> > "exception"?
>
> Yes, short for "exception". I hate to admit it, but it comes from the
> constants we used in the Transmeta microcode ;)
Hm, were I to see 'X86_XCP_MC' for the first time I'd have no
idea what it means. Really, lets not use random new
abbreviations, lets use well-known patterns.
Make it X86_TRAP_XX, it's both short and correct?
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists