linux-kernel - [PATCH RT][PTT] Revert "ACPI: Convert embedded controller lock to raw spinlock"

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1331332286.25686.610.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com>
Date:	Fri, 09 Mar 2012 17:31:26 -0500
From:	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	RT <linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org>
Cc:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Clark Williams <clark@...hat.com>,
	John Kacur <jkacur@...hat.com>, Tim Blechmann <tim@...ngt.org>
Subject: [PATCH RT][PTT] Revert "ACPI: Convert embedded controller lock to
 raw spinlock"

This is a call for PTT (Please Test This).

There's been lots of complaints about acpi failing. One of the solutions
is to revert the spin_lock to raw_spin_locks of the acpi code. This is
the revert. Please apply this to 3.0.23-rt39 and lets see if it fixes
the problem at hand, and make sure it doesn't cause other bugs.

Thanks,

-- Steve



commit 8ba46b8b7b495a98b47dfcb316d16634c3c2c924
Author: Steven Rostedt <srostedt@...hat.com>
Date:   Fri Mar 9 17:14:05 2012 -0500

    Revert "ACPI: Convert embedded controller lock to raw spinlock"
    
    This reverts commit 1a39c79b4d1a6911a39083719a999fbfba7287ae.

diff --git a/drivers/acpi/ec.c b/drivers/acpi/ec.c
index db0e6c3..b72a603 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/ec.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/ec.c
@@ -152,10 +152,10 @@ static int ec_transaction_done(struct acpi_ec *ec)
 {
 	unsigned long flags;
 	int ret = 0;
-	raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&ec->curr_lock, flags);
+	spin_lock_irqsave(&ec->curr_lock, flags);
 	if (!ec->curr || ec->curr->done)
 		ret = 1;
-	raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ec->curr_lock, flags);
+	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ec->curr_lock, flags);
 	return ret;
 }
 
@@ -169,7 +169,7 @@ static void start_transaction(struct acpi_ec *ec)
 static void advance_transaction(struct acpi_ec *ec, u8 status)
 {
 	unsigned long flags;
-	raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&ec->curr_lock, flags);
+	spin_lock_irqsave(&ec->curr_lock, flags);
 	if (!ec->curr)
 		goto unlock;
 	if (ec->curr->wlen > ec->curr->wi) {
@@ -194,7 +194,7 @@ err:
 	if (in_interrupt())
 		++ec->curr->irq_count;
 unlock:
-	raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ec->curr_lock, flags);
+	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ec->curr_lock, flags);
 }
 
 static int acpi_ec_sync_query(struct acpi_ec *ec);
@@ -232,9 +232,9 @@ static int ec_poll(struct acpi_ec *ec)
 		if (acpi_ec_read_status(ec) & ACPI_EC_FLAG_IBF)
 			break;
 		pr_debug(PREFIX "controller reset, restart transaction\n");
-		raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&ec->curr_lock, flags);
+		spin_lock_irqsave(&ec->curr_lock, flags);
 		start_transaction(ec);
-		raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ec->curr_lock, flags);
+		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ec->curr_lock, flags);
 	}
 	return -ETIME;
 }
@@ -247,17 +247,17 @@ static int acpi_ec_transaction_unlocked(struct acpi_ec *ec,
 	if (EC_FLAGS_MSI)
 		udelay(ACPI_EC_MSI_UDELAY);
 	/* start transaction */
-	raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&ec->curr_lock, tmp);
+	spin_lock_irqsave(&ec->curr_lock, tmp);
 	/* following two actions should be kept atomic */
 	ec->curr = t;
 	start_transaction(ec);
 	if (ec->curr->command == ACPI_EC_COMMAND_QUERY)
 		clear_bit(EC_FLAGS_QUERY_PENDING, &ec->flags);
-	raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ec->curr_lock, tmp);
+	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ec->curr_lock, tmp);
 	ret = ec_poll(ec);
-	raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&ec->curr_lock, tmp);
+	spin_lock_irqsave(&ec->curr_lock, tmp);
 	ec->curr = NULL;
-	raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ec->curr_lock, tmp);
+	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ec->curr_lock, tmp);
 	return ret;
 }
 
@@ -678,7 +678,7 @@ static struct acpi_ec *make_acpi_ec(void)
 	mutex_init(&ec->lock);
 	init_swait_head(&ec->wait);
 	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&ec->list);
-	raw_spin_lock_init(&ec->curr_lock);
+	spin_lock_init(&ec->curr_lock);
 	return ec;
 }
 
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/internal.h b/drivers/acpi/internal.h
index 2519b6e..6f889ba 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/internal.h
+++ b/drivers/acpi/internal.h
@@ -64,7 +64,7 @@ struct acpi_ec {
 	struct swait_head wait;
 	struct list_head list;
 	struct transaction *curr;
-	raw_spinlock_t curr_lock;
+	spinlock_t curr_lock;
 };
 
 extern struct acpi_ec *first_ec;


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/