lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Fri, 09 Mar 2012 23:45:19 +0100
From:	Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
To:	Rob Lee <rob.lee@...aro.org>
CC:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>,
	Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the cpuidle-cons tree with the arm-soc
 tree

On 03/09/2012 11:26 PM, Rob Lee wrote:
> Hello Stephen,
>
> Yes, your resolution looks correct to me.

For me too.

Thanks
   -- Daniel


> On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 1:37 AM, Stephen Rothwell<sfr@...b.auug.org.au>  wrote:
>> Hi Rob,
>>
>> Today's linux-next merge of the cpuidle-cons tree got a conflict in
>> arch/arm/mach-at91/cpuidle.c between commit 00482a4078f4 ("ARM: at91:
>> implement the standby function for pm/cpuidle") from the arm-soc tree and
>> commit 7a1f6e72dce1 ("ARM: at91: Consolidate time keeping and irq
>> enable") from the cpuidle-cons tree.
>>
>> I fixed it up (I think - see below) and can carry the fix as necessary.
>> --
>> Cheers,
>> Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@...b.auug.org.au
>>
>> diff --cc arch/arm/mach-at91/cpuidle.c
>> index 555d956,d40b3f3..0000000
>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-at91/cpuidle.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-at91/cpuidle.c
>> @@@ -37,23 -33,15 +33,8 @@@ static int at91_enter_idle(struct cpuid
>>                         struct cpuidle_driver *drv,
>>                                int index)
>>   {
>> -       struct timeval before, after;
>> -       int idle_time;
>> -
>> -       local_irq_disable();
>> -       do_gettimeofday(&before);
>> -       if (index == 0)
>> -               /* Wait for interrupt state */
>> -               cpu_do_idle();
>> -       else if (index == 1)
>> -               at91_standby();
>>   -      u32 saved_lpr;
>>   -
>>   -      __asm__("b 1f; .align 5; 1:\n"
>>   -      "       mcr p15, 0, r0, c7, c10, 4");   /* drain write buffer */
>>   -
>>   -      saved_lpr = sdram_selfrefresh_enable();
>>   -      cpu_do_idle();
>>   -      sdram_selfrefresh_disable(saved_lpr);
>> ++      at91_standby();
>>
>> -       do_gettimeofday(&after);
>> -       local_irq_enable();
>> -       idle_time = (after.tv_sec - before.tv_sec) * USEC_PER_SEC +
>> -                       (after.tv_usec - before.tv_usec);
>> -
>> -       dev->last_residency = idle_time;
>>         return index;
>>   }
>>


-- 
  <http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs

Follow Linaro:  <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ