[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120311224128.23283.qmail@science.horizon.com>
Date: 11 Mar 2012 18:41:28 -0400
From: "George Spelvin" <linux@...izon.com>
To: dmitry.torokhov@...il.com, dtor@...l.ru
Cc: linux@...izon.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] Input: atkbd - make repeat period more accurate.
This replaces some inaccurate lookup tables with an
exact computation. Although the diff adds code lines,
it shrinks binary size. (By only 50 bytes, but hey!)
AT keyboard repeat rates are multiples of 1/240 second
expressed in a 0.2.3 bit floating point format. That
is, possible values are ({8..15} << {0..3}) / 240 s.
In addition to a slightly inaccurate lookup table, the
old code would round up to the next repeat period.
E.g. to get a period of 9/60 = 0.15 seconds, you had to
ask for no more than 149 ms; if you asked for 150, it
would round up to 167. The new code rounds to nearest.
User-visible changes to the repeat periods reported by EVIOCGREP:
Old 37 109 116 149 182
Exact 37.50 108.33 116.66 150.00 183.33
New 38 108 117 150 183
Old 232 270 303 370 435 470
Exact 233.33 266.66 300.00 366.66 433.33 466.66
New 233 267 300 367 433 467
This does not bother utilities like kbdrate(8).
Signed-off-by: George Spelvin <linux@...izon.com>
---
drivers/input/keyboard/atkbd.c | 41 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
1 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
Dmitry, you seem to be the one constant name in all recent changes to
this file, so I'm sending this to you for comment. Like it? Hate it?
Please DON'T apply this until I've done more testing, but if you
hate it, tell me and I'll abandon it.
Users of the KDKBDREP ioctl seem to assume that it returns the actual
values set, but I'm not sure it really works that way; I don't think
the command to change the parameters makes its way through the event
queue and atkbd's schedule_delayed_work() to actually set dev->rep[]
to the rounded values before kbd_rate_helper returns them to userspace.
But that's a separate problem.
If desired, the fix that's most obvious to me would be to perform the
conversion to a command byte synchronously, and only defer the actual
ps2_command().
diff --git a/drivers/input/keyboard/atkbd.c b/drivers/input/keyboard/atkbd.c
index e05a2e7..73efac1 100644
--- a/drivers/input/keyboard/atkbd.c
+++ b/drivers/input/keyboard/atkbd.c
@@ -526,25 +526,38 @@ out:
static int atkbd_set_repeat_rate(struct atkbd *atkbd)
{
- const short period[32] =
- { 33, 37, 42, 46, 50, 54, 58, 63, 67, 75, 83, 92, 100, 109, 116, 125,
- 133, 149, 167, 182, 200, 217, 232, 250, 270, 303, 333, 370, 400, 435, 470, 500 };
- const short delay[4] =
- { 250, 500, 750, 1000 };
-
struct input_dev *dev = atkbd->dev;
unsigned char param;
- int i = 0, j = 0;
+ int delay = dev->rep[REP_DELAY];
+ unsigned exp = 3; /* Period exponent */
+ int period = dev->rep[REP_PERIOD]; /* Period mantissa */
- while (i < ARRAY_SIZE(period) - 1 && period[i] < dev->rep[REP_PERIOD])
- i++;
- dev->rep[REP_PERIOD] = period[i];
+ /* AT kbd delay is {1..4} * 250 ms. Clamp to range */
+ if (delay < 125)
+ delay = 125;
+ else if (delay > 1000)
+ delay = 1000;
+ /* Round to 2-bit value */
+ delay = (delay + 125) / 250u;
+ /* Store actual value back */
+ dev->rep[REP_DELAY] = delay * 250;
- while (j < ARRAY_SIZE(delay) - 1 && delay[j] < dev->rep[REP_DELAY])
- j++;
- dev->rep[REP_DELAY] = delay[j];
+ /* AT kbd period is ({8..15} << {0..3}) / 240 s. */
+ if (period < 34)
+ period = 34;
+ else if (period > 500)
+ period = 500;
+ /* Get correct exponent */
+ while (period <= 250) {
+ period <<= 1;
+ exp--;
+ }
+ /* Convert from 251..500 ms to 8..15 30ths of a second */
+ period = (period * 3 + 50) / 100u;
+ /* Store actual value back */
+ dev->rep[REP_PERIOD] = ((period << exp) * 25 + 3) / 6;
- param = i | (j << 5);
+ param = (delay - 1) << 5 | exp << 3 | (period - 8);
return ps2_command(&atkbd->ps2dev, ¶m, ATKBD_CMD_SETREP);
}
--
1.7.9.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists