[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120311132746.GA13336@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2012 13:27:46 +0000
From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
To: santosh nayak <santoshprasadnayak@...il.com>
Cc: FlorianSchandinat@....de, linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Video : Amba: Use in_interrupt() in clcdfb_sleep().
On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 06:44:25PM +0530, santosh nayak wrote:
> From: Santosh Nayak <santoshprasadnayak@...il.com>
>
> Instead of "in_atomic()", we can use in_interrupt() to check whether
> its an interrupt context.
What are you trying to fix?
Your description is an example of a bad commit comment. It merely
describes the change, which anyone can see by looking at the diff.
What it totally and utterly fails to do is to describe _why_ the
change is necessary or what the problem is.
So, until it does, this patch gets a definite NAK.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists