[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4F5DA722.3090806@codeaurora.org>
Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2012 00:34:58 -0700
From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
To: Yang Bai <hamo.by@...il.com>
CC: mmarek@...e.cz, rostedt@...dmis.org, adobriyan@...il.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Makefile: fix error when gen TAGS
On 3/12/2012 12:06 AM, Yang Bai wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 2:46 PM, Stephen Boyd<sboyd@...eaurora.org> wrote:
>>
>> What does ctags --version print out for you? I'm not aware of exuberant tags
>> outputting files called TAGS (although etags would do that and then this
>> patch wouldn't make sense).
> hamo@...nity ~ $ ctags --version
> Exuberant Ctags 5.9~svn20110310, Copyright (C) 1996-2009 Darren Hiebert
> Compiled: Nov 9 2011, 03:17:31
> Addresses:<dhiebert@...rs.sourceforge.net>, http://ctags.sourceforge.net
> Optional compiled features: +wildcards, +regex
>
> hamo@...nity ~ $ etags --version
> Exuberant Ctags 5.9~svn20110310, Copyright (C) 1996-2009 Darren Hiebert
> Compiled: Nov 9 2011, 03:17:31
> Addresses:<dhiebert@...rs.sourceforge.net>, http://ctags.sourceforge.net
> Optional compiled features: +wildcards, +regex
>
> hamo@...nity ~ $ ls -l /usr/bin/etags
> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 23 Feb 8 17:48 /usr/bin/etags -> /etc/alternatives/etags
> hamo@...nity ~ $ ls -l /etc/alternatives/etags
> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 24 Feb 15 10:06 /etc/alternatives/etags ->
> /usr/bin/ctags-exuberant
>
> So I think which kind of name Exuberant Ctags generates depends on argv[0].
>
Ah ok. How about this patch instead? Then we don't duplicate the sed
statement.
---->8-------
diff --git a/scripts/tags.sh b/scripts/tags.sh
index 833813a..b390096 100755
--- a/scripts/tags.sh
+++ b/scripts/tags.sh
@@ -168,7 +168,7 @@ exuberant()
--regex-dotconfig='/^#?[[:blank:]]*(CONFIG_[[:alnum:]_]+)/\1/'
# Remove structure forward declarations.
- LANG=C sed -i -e '/^\([a-zA-Z_][a-zA-Z0-9_]*\)\t.*\t\/\^struct \1;.*\$\/;"\tx$/d' tags
+ LANG=C sed -i -e '/^\([a-zA-Z_][a-zA-Z0-9_]*\)\t.*\t\/\^struct \1;.*\$\/;"\tx$/d' $2
}
emacs()
@@ -213,9 +213,9 @@ emacs()
xtags()
{
if $1 --version 2>&1 | grep -iq exuberant; then
- exuberant $1
+ exuberant $1 $2
elif $1 --version 2>&1 | grep -iq emacs; then
- emacs $1
+ emacs $1 $2
else
all_sources | xargs $1 -a
fi
@@ -244,11 +244,11 @@ case "$1" in
"tags")
rm -f tags
- xtags ctags
+ xtags ctags $1
;;
"TAGS")
rm -f TAGS
- xtags etags
+ xtags etags $1
;;
esac
But then with your next patch maybe it would be better to just have a flag?
----8<-----
diff --git a/scripts/tags.sh b/scripts/tags.sh
index 833813a..4b1755d 100755
--- a/scripts/tags.sh
+++ b/scripts/tags.sh
@@ -166,9 +166,6 @@ exuberant()
all_defconfigs | xargs -r $1 -a \
--langdef=dotconfig --language-force=dotconfig \
--regex-dotconfig='/^#?[[:blank:]]*(CONFIG_[[:alnum:]_]+)/\1/'
-
- # Remove structure forward declarations.
- LANG=C sed -i -e '/^\([a-zA-Z_][a-zA-Z0-9_]*\)\t.*\t\/\^struct \1;.*\$\/;"\tx$/d' tags
}
emacs()
@@ -233,6 +230,7 @@ if [ "${ARCH}" = "um" ]; then
fi
fi
+remove_structs=
case "$1" in
"cscope")
docscope
@@ -244,11 +242,18 @@ case "$1" in
"tags")
rm -f tags
- xtags ctags
+ xtags ctags $1
+ remove_structs=y
;;
"TAGS")
rm -f TAGS
- xtags etags
+ xtags etags $1
+ remove_structs=y
;;
esac
+
+# Remove structure forward declarations.
+if [ -n $remove_structs ]; then
+ LANG=C sed -i -e '/^\([a-zA-Z_][a-zA-Z0-9_]*\)\t.*\t\/\^struct \1;.*\$\/;"\tx$/d' $1
+fi
--
Sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists