[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4F5DAB30.3040409@codeaurora.org>
Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2012 00:52:16 -0700
From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
To: Yang Bai <hamo.by@...il.com>
CC: mmarek@...e.cz, rostedt@...dmis.org, adobriyan@...il.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Makefile: fix error when gen TAGS
On 3/12/2012 12:50 AM, Yang Bai wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 3:34 PM, Stephen Boyd<sboyd@...eaurora.org> wrote:
>> Ah ok. How about this patch instead? Then we don't duplicate the sed
>> statement.
>>
>> ---->8-------
>>
>> diff --git a/scripts/tags.sh b/scripts/tags.sh
>> index 833813a..b390096 100755
>> --- a/scripts/tags.sh
>> +++ b/scripts/tags.sh
>> @@ -168,7 +168,7 @@ exuberant()
>>
>> --regex-dotconfig='/^#?[[:blank:]]*(CONFIG_[[:alnum:]_]+)/\1/'
>>
>> # Remove structure forward declarations.
>> - LANG=C sed -i -e '/^\([a-zA-Z_][a-zA-Z0-9_]*\)\t.*\t\/\^struct
>> \1;.*\$\/;"\tx$/d' tags
>> + LANG=C sed -i -e '/^\([a-zA-Z_][a-zA-Z0-9_]*\)\t.*\t\/\^struct
>> \1;.*\$\/;"\tx$/d' $2
>> }
>>
>> emacs()
>> @@ -213,9 +213,9 @@ emacs()
>> xtags()
>> {
>> if $1 --version 2>&1 | grep -iq exuberant; then
>> - exuberant $1
>> + exuberant $1 $2
>> elif $1 --version 2>&1 | grep -iq emacs; then
>> - emacs $1
>> + emacs $1 $2
>> else
>> all_sources | xargs $1 -a
>> fi
>> @@ -244,11 +244,11 @@ case "$1" in
>>
>> "tags")
>> rm -f tags
>> - xtags ctags
>> + xtags ctags $1
>> ;;
>>
>> "TAGS")
>> rm -f TAGS
>> - xtags etags
>> + xtags etags $1
>> ;;
>> esac
>>
>>
>> But then with your next patch maybe it would be better to just have a flag?
>>
>> ----8<-----
>>
>> diff --git a/scripts/tags.sh b/scripts/tags.sh
>> index 833813a..4b1755d 100755
>> --- a/scripts/tags.sh
>> +++ b/scripts/tags.sh
>> @@ -166,9 +166,6 @@ exuberant()
>> all_defconfigs | xargs -r $1 -a \
>> --langdef=dotconfig --language-force=dotconfig \
>>
>> --regex-dotconfig='/^#?[[:blank:]]*(CONFIG_[[:alnum:]_]+)/\1/'
>> -
>> - # Remove structure forward declarations.
>>
>> - LANG=C sed -i -e '/^\([a-zA-Z_][a-zA-Z0-9_]*\)\t.*\t\/\^struct
>> \1;.*\$\/;"\tx$/d' tags
>> }
>>
>> emacs()
>> @@ -233,6 +230,7 @@ if [ "${ARCH}" = "um" ]; then
>> fi
>> fi
>>
>> +remove_structs=
>> case "$1" in
>> "cscope")
>> docscope
>> @@ -244,11 +242,18 @@ case "$1" in
>>
>> "tags")
>> rm -f tags
>> - xtags ctags
>> + xtags ctags $1
> Why we need a $1 here??
>> + remove_structs=y
>> ;;
>>
>> "TAGS")
>> rm -f TAGS
>> - xtags etags
>> + xtags etags $1
> The same.
>> + remove_structs=y
>> ;;
>> esac
>> +
>> +# Remove structure forward declarations.
>> +if [ -n $remove_structs ]; then
>> + LANG=C sed -i -e '/^\([a-zA-Z_][a-zA-Z0-9_]*\)\t.*\t\/\^struct
>> \1;.*\$\/;"\tx$/d' $1
>> +fi
>>
> This way is better but I don't understand why a $1 is there.
> I think it is useless and if you agree with me, i will send a fine patch to you.
It's a holdover from the previous patch. Thanks for spotting/removing it.
--
Sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists