linux-kernel - Re: [ 02/12] Remove COMPAT

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1331565925.3022.157.camel@deadeye>
Date:	Mon, 12 Mar 2012 15:25:25 +0000
From:	Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
To:	Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>
Cc:	Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [ 02/12] Remove COMPAT_IA32 support

On Mon, 2012-03-12 at 07:30 +0100, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 07:49:48PM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 01:07:26AM +0000, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2012-03-12 at 01:20 +0100, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> > > > 2.6.32-longterm review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
> > > 
> > > The subject/first line should include '[IA64]', as in the original
> > > commit.  It looks like this has been automatically stripped.
> > 
> > Yeah, munging patches to and from quilt and git will cause that to
> > happen at times, it's quite common :(
> 
> Indeed, and I've even changed my patch formats in haproxy to avoid brackets
> due to this issue. The cause is that many patches are sent with a [PATCH]
> prefix and that with Git, either you keep the subject line intact or you
> remove everything that is between brackets. There's the -b option to only
> remove remove tags looking like [PATCH], but my general experience with it
> was not satisfying (I don't remind why). I have added some scripts to do
> this at some points in the process but it's not 100% reliable as can be
> seen here.
> 
> The "funny" thing here is that this comment lacking any IA64 tag annoyed
> me a bit, and I was about to change its name then refrained from doing
> so because I prefered not to keep the original message intact as I did
> not notice the tag went off on my side :-/
> 
> Ben, I strongly suggest that you too switch your practise from "[IA64]"
> to "IA64:" as can be seen on many kernel commits these days.

That is my personal practice.  But I copied this subject from the
mainline commit.

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings
Life would be so much easier if we could look at the source code.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (829 bytes)