[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1331572403.1149.19.camel@fedora>
Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2012 13:13:23 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <srostedt@...hat.com>
To: Rob Lee <rob.lee@...aro.org>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the cpuidle-cons tree with the tip
tree
On Mon, 2012-03-12 at 12:06 -0500, Rob Lee wrote:
>
> Looks good to me as well.
>
> Who should carry this fixup?
I think it's trivial enough that Linus can handle it. He always said
that he likes to fix merge conflicts and has yelled at people who did
things to prevent them.
-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists