[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120312222817.GI23255@google.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2012 15:28:17 -0700
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Li Zefan <lizf@...fujitsu.com>,
containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org, cgroups@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@...y.org>,
Lennart Poettering <lennart@...ttering.net>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>,
Michal Schmidt <mschmidt@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFD] cgroup: about multiple hierarchies
Hey,
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 11:22:18PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-03-12 at 15:10 -0700, Tejun Heo wrote:
> >
> > * How to map controllers which aren't aware of full hierarchy is still
> > an open question but I'm still standing by one active node on any
> > root-to-leaf path w/ root group serving as the special rest group.
>
> What does this mean?
Let's say we have a tree like the following.
root
/ | \
G1 G2 G3
/ \
G31 G32
So, for cgroups which don't support full hierarchy, it'll be viewed as
either,
root
/ | \
G1 G2 G3
or
root
/ | | \
G1 G2 G31 G32
With root being treated specially, probably as just being a equal
group as other groups, I'm not fully determined about that yet.
Thanks.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists