[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1331520476.4657.79.camel@vkoul-udesk3>
Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2012 08:17:56 +0530
From: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...el.com>
To: Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@....de>
Cc: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
'Jassi Brar' <jassisinghbrar@...il.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@...il.com>,
Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC] dmaengine: add a slave parameter to
__dma_request_channel()
On Fri, 2012-03-09 at 13:20 +0100, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> It can be made to work as long as there's only one DMAC group with
> configurable channels and all other DMACs are dedicated to specific
> peripherals, yes. I don't know whether there are already now or are
> approaching any platforms with multiple reconfigurable groups.
And that is what I am talking about.
Having specific channel mapping given by platform for all channels which
are to be used dedicated. And a pool of channels which can be used by
anyone (if they can be) on a platform.
Does this proposal sound good for others as well. I think we can target
this for next merge cycle, we are too late for the current one.
--
~Vinod
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists