linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/5] ARM: Exynos4: Add pinctrl devices and pin maps

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAJuYYwQPrOte4EjpfBbUW0vg+qFJwYgZcSM88iZ95C8LwWuptg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 12 Mar 2012 09:52:10 +0530
From:	Thomas Abraham <thomas.abraham@...aro.org>
To:	Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@...sung.com>
Cc:	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, linus.walleij@...aro.org,
	patches@...aro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] ARM: Exynos4: Add pinctrl devices and pin maps

2012/3/12 Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@...sung.com>:
> Thomas Abraham wrote:
>> Add the three pinctrl platform devices and the pin maps for Exynos4.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Thomas Abraham<thomas.abraham@...aro.org>
>> ---
>>   arch/arm/mach-exynos/Kconfig              |    1 +
>>   arch/arm/mach-exynos/Makefile             |    1 +
>>   arch/arm/mach-exynos/common.h             |    6 ++
>>   arch/arm/mach-exynos/dev-pinctrl.c        |  115 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>   arch/arm/plat-samsung/include/plat/devs.h |    3 +
>>   5 files changed, 126 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>>   create mode 100644 arch/arm/mach-exynos/dev-pinctrl.c
>
> [...]
>
>> +#include<linux/kernel.h>
>> +#include<linux/dma-mapping.h>
>> +#include<linux/platform_device.h>
>> +#include<linux/interrupt.h>
>> +#include<linux/pinctrl/machine.h>
>
> #include <linux/ioport.h> for DEFINE_RES_xxx at below.
>
>> +
>> +#include<plat/devs.h>
>> +#include<plat/pinctrl.h>
>> +
>> +#include<mach/map.h>
>> +
>> +static struct resource exynos4_pinctrl_resource0[] = {
>> +     [0] = {
>> +             .start  = EXYNOS4_PA_GPIO1,
>> +             .end    = EXYNOS4_PA_GPIO1 + SZ_4K - 1,
>> +             .flags  = IORESOURCE_MEM,
>> +     },
>
> [0] = DEFINE_RES_MEM(EXYNOS4_PA_GPIO1, SZ_4K),
>
>> +     [1] = {
>> +             .start  = IRQ_GPIO_XA,
>> +             .end    = IRQ_GPIO_XA,
>> +             .flags  = IORESOURCE_IRQ,
>> +     },
>
> [1] = DEFINE_RES_IRQ(IRQ_GPIO_XA),
>
> But I'm thinking, we need to move to use EXYNOS4_IRQ_GPIO_XA here for
> both EXYNOS4 and EXYNOS5 and as a note, I'm working on updating IRQ
> naming you can see it in this week :)

Thanks for reviewing this patch series. I will use DEFINE_RES_xxx for
resource instantiation.

Regards,
Thomas.

[...]
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/