[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120313004642.GA19090@host2.jankratochvil.net>
Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2012 01:46:42 +0100
From: Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@...hat.com>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@...hat.com>,
Roland McGrath <roland@...k.frob.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Kushal Das <kdas@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: Extending coredump note section to contain filenames
On Tue, 13 Mar 2012 01:42:18 +0100, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> There is no 100% reliable solution possible -- you have no guarantee of
> any kind that the library executable still exists.
I have guarantee that the library binary mapped in memory identified by
build-id can be found out there in the could. There is no other guarantee.
And this guarantee fails with other solutions.
If you say that it is _additional_ info to build-id then yes, one can always
use build-id if everything else fails. But then the non-build-id information
is redundant and it can just lead to wrong toolchain solutions - which has
already happened (Apport).
Regards,
Jan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists