linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH] Fix the race between smp_call

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 13 Mar 2012 06:46:15 +0000
From:	"Liu, Chuansheng" <chuansheng.liu@...el.com>
To:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
CC:	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Yanmin Zhang <yanmin_zhang@...ux.intel.com>,
	"tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] Fix the race between smp_call_function and CPU booting



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Peter Zijlstra [mailto:peterz@...radead.org]
> Sent: Monday, March 12, 2012 5:58 PM
> To: Liu, Chuansheng
> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; Yanmin Zhang; tglx@...utronix.de
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix the race between smp_call_function and CPU booting
> 
> On Mon, 2012-03-12 at 09:27 +0000, Liu, Chuansheng wrote:
> > The solution is just to send smp call to active cpus instead of online
> > cpus.
> 
> BTW, that solution is broken because !active cpus can still be online and
> actually running stuff, so sending IPIs to them is perfectly fine and actually
> required.
> 
Based on current code base, the IPI can be handled only after the cpu is active, before CPU is active,
Any sending IPI is meanless.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/