[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-id: <4F5EF376.3060909@samsung.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2012 16:12:54 +0900
From: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>
To: Venu Byravarasu <vbyravarasu@...dia.com>
Cc: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@...sung.com>,
"sameo@...ux.intel.com" <sameo@...ux.intel.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"myungjoo.ham@...sung.com" <myungjoo.ham@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH 1/2] MFD: MAX77693: add MAX77693 MFD driver
On 03/13/2012 02:52 PM, Venu Byravarasu wrote:
>> So we decide to use legacy way. As regmap is not yet tested. So we
>> summit the current way and revise it later.
>
> I was under the impression that regmap is stable now. Can you
> plz let me know, what kind of problems you are seeing with
> regmap? As I'm also planning to upstream a MFD using regmap
> very soon, this information will be useful.
I had plan for using regmap for i2c read/write operation on later patch.
But I haven't yet tested max77693 driver with regmap for i2c,
so I posted max77693 mfd driver which was tested by using i2c legacy way.
Thank you,
Chanwoo Choi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists