linux-kernel - Re: Fwd: Control page reclaim granularity

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20120313080535.GA5243@gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 13 Mar 2012 16:05:35 +0800
From:	Zheng Liu <gnehzuil.liu@...il.com>
To:	Kautuk Consul <consul.kautuk@...il.com>
Cc:	minchan@...nel.org, riel@...hat.com,
	kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com, Zheng Liu <wenqing.lz@...bao.com>,
	linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Fwd: Control page reclaim granularity

On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 01:17:41PM +0530, Kautuk Consul wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 1:13 PM, Kautuk Consul <consul.kautuk@...il.com> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I noticed this discussion and decided to pitch in one small idea from my side.
> >
> > It would be nice to range lock an inode's pages by storing those
> > ranges which would be locked.
> > This could also add some good routines for the kernel in terms of
> > range locking for a single inode.
> > However, wouldn't this add some overhead to shrink_page_list() since
> > that code would need to go through
> > all these ranges while trying to reclaim a single page ?
> >
> > One small suggestion from my side is:
> > Why don't we implement something like : "Complete page-cache reclaim
> > control from usermode"?
> > In this, we can set/unset the mapping to AS_UNEVICTABLE (as Konstantin
> > mentioned) for a file's
> > inode from usermode by using ioctl or fcntl or maybe even go as far as
> > implementing an O_NORECL
> > option to the open system call.
> >
> 
> Of course, only an application executing with root privileges should
> be allowed to set the inode's
> mapping flags in this manner.

Hi Kautuk,

IMHO, running application with root privilege is too dangerous.  We
should avoid it.

Regards,
Zheng

> 
> 
> > After setting the AS_UNEVICTABLE, the usermode application can choose
> > to keep and remove pages by
> > using the fadvise(WILLNEED) and fadvise(DONTNEED).
> >
> > ( I think maybe the presence of any VMA is might not really be
> > required for this idea. )
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Kautuk.
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
> the body to majordomo@...ck.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
> see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
> Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
> Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@...ck.org"> email@...ck.org </a>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/