[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120313080748.GA7754@tiehlicka.suse.cz>
Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2012 09:07:48 +0100
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>
To: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>
Cc: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v2] fix idle ticks in cpu summary line of /proc/stat
OK, so the updated version of the patch looks like this. I am sorry but
I had time to only compile test this...
---
>From d12247f14c5f8b00ae97a87442f62e49227a759b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>
Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2012 13:11:38 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] nohz: fix idle ticks in cpu summary line of /proc/stat
Git commit 09a1d34f8535ecf9 "nohz: Make idle/iowait counter update
conditional" introduced a bug in regard to cpu hotplug. The effect is
that the number of idle ticks in the cpu summary line in /proc/stat is
still counting ticks for offline cpus.
Reproduction is easy, just start a workload that keeps all cpus busy,
switch off one or more cpus and then watch the idle field in top.
On a dual-core with one cpu 100% busy and one offline cpu you will get
something like this:
%Cpu(s): 48.7 us, 1.3 sy, 0.0 ni, 50.0 id, 0.0 wa, 0.0 hi, 0.0 si, 0.0 st
The problem is that an offline cpu still has ts->idle_active == 1.
To fix this we should make sure that the cpu is online when calling
get_cpu_idle_time_us and get_cpu_iowait_time_us.
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reported-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>
---
fs/proc/stat.c | 14 ++++++++++----
1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/proc/stat.c b/fs/proc/stat.c
index 121f77c..62bda24 100644
--- a/fs/proc/stat.c
+++ b/fs/proc/stat.c
@@ -24,10 +24,13 @@
static u64 get_idle_time(int cpu)
{
- u64 idle, idle_time = get_cpu_idle_time_us(cpu, NULL);
+ u64 idle, idle_time = -1ULL;
+
+ if (cpu_online(cpu))
+ idle_time = get_cpu_idle_time_us(cpu, NULL);
if (idle_time == -1ULL) {
- /* !NO_HZ so we can rely on cpustat.idle */
+ /* !NO_HZ or cpu offline so we can rely on cpustat.idle */
idle = kcpustat_cpu(cpu).cpustat[CPUTIME_IDLE];
idle += arch_idle_time(cpu);
} else
@@ -38,10 +41,13 @@ static u64 get_idle_time(int cpu)
static u64 get_iowait_time(int cpu)
{
- u64 iowait, iowait_time = get_cpu_iowait_time_us(cpu, NULL);
+ u64 iowait, iowait_time = -1ULL;
+
+ if (cpu_online(cpu))
+ iowait_time = get_cpu_iowait_time_us(cpu, NULL);
if (iowait_time == -1ULL)
- /* !NO_HZ so we can rely on cpustat.iowait */
+ /* !NO_HZ or cpu offline so we can rely on cpustat.iowait */
iowait = kcpustat_cpu(cpu).cpustat[CPUTIME_IOWAIT];
else
iowait = usecs_to_cputime64(iowait_time);
--
1.7.9.1
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
SUSE LINUX s.r.o.
Lihovarska 1060/12
190 00 Praha 9
Czech Republic
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists