| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CAMHCuPXSCZjiyW28aPPjO4zF0vgabZUrqtUK5nMXLwNzSWUjQA@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2012 15:15:03 +0530 From: Sundar <sunder.svit@...il.com> To: Amit Kachhap <amit.kachhap@...aro.org> Cc: mark.gross@...el.com, len.brown@...el.com, linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org, linaro-dev@...ts.linaro.org, patches@...aro.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, rob.lee@...aro.org Subject: Re: [linux-pm] [PATCH 2/4] thermal: Add generic cpufreq cooling implementation Hi Amit, Thanks for the replies. One more query On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 10:37 AM, Amit Kachhap <amit.kachhap@...aro.org> wrote: >> "Different cpu related cooling devices": Do you mean cooling devices >> for different CPUs (num_cpus) or are you referring to different >> customers aka consumer drivers who could use this framework and impose >> the cooling. > Correct but the consumer driver only has to use the other > thermal-sys.c functions. Only register cpu cooling devices is > implemented in this work. Am i right in noting that this framework then doesnt handle other devices for cooling like Graphics, LCD etc? Cheers! -- --------- The views expressed in this email are personal and do not necessarily echo my employers. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists