linux-kernel - Re: [linux-pm] [PATCH 2/4] thermal: Add generic cpufreq cooling implementation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 13 Mar 2012 15:15:03 +0530
From:	Sundar <sunder.svit@...il.com>
To:	Amit Kachhap <amit.kachhap@...aro.org>
Cc:	mark.gross@...el.com, len.brown@...el.com,
	linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org, linaro-dev@...ts.linaro.org,
	patches@...aro.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, rob.lee@...aro.org
Subject: Re: [linux-pm] [PATCH 2/4] thermal: Add generic cpufreq cooling implementation

Hi Amit,

Thanks for the replies. One more query

On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 10:37 AM, Amit Kachhap <amit.kachhap@...aro.org> wrote:

>> "Different cpu related cooling devices": Do you mean cooling devices
>> for different CPUs (num_cpus) or are you referring to different
>> customers aka consumer drivers who could use this framework and impose
>> the cooling.
> Correct but the consumer driver only has to use the other
> thermal-sys.c functions. Only register cpu cooling devices is
> implemented in this work.

Am i right in noting that this framework then doesnt handle other
devices for cooling like Graphics, LCD etc?

Cheers!
-- 
---------
The views expressed in this email are personal and do not necessarily
echo my employers.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/