[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120313095020.GA13220@flint.arm.linux.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2012 09:50:20 +0000
From: Russell King <rmk@....linux.org.uk>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL/NEXT] sched/arch: Introduce the
finish_arch_post_lock_switch() scheduler callback
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 10:26:49AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> As I said it in my first mail, doing that is unnecessary - but
> if you insist on being difficult then Catalin, feel free to pull
> the patch from tip:sched/arch:
Nope, I'm not taking the tree anymore, you've refused to behave in a
reasonable way. Your problem to sort out now.
--
Russell King
Linux kernel 2.6 ARM Linux - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/
maintainer of:
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists