[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120313115552.GA21043@infradead.org>
Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2012 07:55:52 -0400
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>, viro@...IV.linux.org.uk,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Trond.Myklebust@...app.com, sfrench@...ba.org, sage@...dream.net,
ericvh@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/25] vfs: add i_op->atomic_create()
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 12:22:10PM +0100, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> Good point. Yes, ->create is probably worth getting rid of. Mkdir, I'm
> not so sure, but I'll look at what filesystems are doing.
Btw, is there any good reason to keep ->atomic_open and ->atomic_create
separate? It seems like the instances in general share code anyway.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists