linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RT] preempt: Define preempt_check_resched

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAONaPpEFOrYFH9=HX+QUweGKqxXw2GUmj9+BAzwmxFtyJX=p+w@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 13 Mar 2012 14:32:42 +0100
From:	John Kacur <jkacur@...hat.com>
To:	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	RT <linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Clark Williams <clark@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RT] preempt: Define preempt_check_resched_rt() for non
 PREEMPT config

On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 3:50 AM, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> wrote:
>
> Fix compiler error when CONFIG_PREEMPT is not set.
>
> Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/preempt.h b/include/linux/preempt.h
> index 4125456..11412d7 100644
> --- a/include/linux/preempt.h
> +++ b/include/linux/preempt.h
> @@ -95,6 +95,7 @@ do { \
>  #define preempt_enable_no_resched()    do { } while (0)
>  #define preempt_enable()               do { } while (0)
>  #define preempt_check_resched()                do { } while (0)
> +#define preempt_check_resched_rt()     do { } while (0)
>
>  #define preempt_disable_notrace()              do { } while (0)
>  #define preempt_enable_no_resched_notrace()    do { } while (0)
>

This is the same patch I sent for v3.2.9-rt17. (where you complained
because I gave clark a SOB instead of a Tested-by:) I see that
#define preempt_check_resched()
without the _rt has been shuffled to a more logical spot which is the
only way I recognized that you mean this for v3.0.23-rt.

Could we please start to specify the rt-kernel version in these patches?

Thanks

John
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/