[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <878vj48vsr.fsf@tucsk.pomaz.szeredi.hu>
Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2012 14:39:16 +0100
From: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc: viro@...IV.linux.org.uk, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Trond.Myklebust@...app.com,
sfrench@...ba.org, sage@...dream.net, ericvh@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 13/25] cifs: implement i_op->atomic_open() and i_op->atomic_create()
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org> writes:
> On Wed, Mar 07, 2012 at 10:22:30PM +0100, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
>> From: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@...e.cz>
>>
>> Replace CIFS's ->create operation with ->atomic_open and ->atomic_create. Also
>> move the relevant code from ->lookup into the create function.
>>
>> CIFS currently only does atomic open for O_CREAT, but it wants to do that as
>> early as possible, without first calling ->lookup, so it uses ->atomic_open,
>> just like NFS.
>
> Why does cifs need to set the created flag from inside ->atomic_open?
>
> It's different from everyone else in that respect.
Apparently CIFS is the only one that can tell whether the file was
created or not. If the flag is set then notify_create() is called.
Users of NFS doesn't seem to care, it's of dubious value anyway, but why
not use the info when available?
Thanks,
Miklos
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists