Message-ID: <20120313143340.GT24916@truffala.fritz.box>
Date:	Wed, 14 Mar 2012 01:33:40 +1100
From:	David Gibson <david@...son.dropbear.id.au>
To:	Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>
Cc:	aik@...abs.ru, dwmw2@...radead.org,
	iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org, benh@...nel.crashing.org,
	qemu-devel@...gnu.org, joerg.roedel@....com, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Isolation groups

On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 04:32:54PM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>
> ---
> 
>  drivers/base/Kconfig      |   10 +
>  drivers/base/Makefile     |    1 
>  drivers/base/base.h       |    5 
>  drivers/base/isolation.c  |  798 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  include/linux/device.h    |    4 
>  include/linux/isolation.h |  138 ++++++++
>  6 files changed, 956 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 drivers/base/isolation.c
>  create mode 100644 include/linux/isolation.h
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/base/Kconfig b/drivers/base/Kconfig
> index 7be9f79..e98a5f3 100644
> --- a/drivers/base/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/base/Kconfig
> @@ -189,4 +189,14 @@ config DMA_SHARED_BUFFER
>  	  APIs extension; the file's descriptor can then be passed on to other
>  	  driver.
>  
> +config ISOLATION_GROUPS
> +	bool "Enable Isolation Group API"
> +	default n
> +	depends on EXPERIMENTAL && IOMMU_API
> +	help
> +	  This option enables grouping of devices into Isolation Groups
> +	  which may be used by other subsystems to perform quirks across
> +	  sets of devices as well as userspace drivers for guaranteeing
> +	  devices are isolated from the rest of the system.
> +
>  endmenu
> diff --git a/drivers/base/Makefile b/drivers/base/Makefile
> index 610f999..047b5f9 100644
> --- a/drivers/base/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/base/Makefile
> @@ -19,6 +19,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_MODULES)	+= module.o
>  endif
>  obj-$(CONFIG_SYS_HYPERVISOR) += hypervisor.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_REGMAP)	+= regmap/
> +obj-$(CONFIG_ISOLATION_GROUPS)	+= isolation.o
>  
>  ccflags-$(CONFIG_DEBUG_DRIVER) := -DDEBUG
>  
> diff --git a/drivers/base/base.h b/drivers/base/base.h
> index b858dfd..376758a 100644
> --- a/drivers/base/base.h
> +++ b/drivers/base/base.h
> @@ -1,4 +1,5 @@
>  #include <linux/notifier.h>
> +#include <linux/isolation.h>
>  
>  /**
>   * struct subsys_private - structure to hold the private to the driver core portions of the bus_type/class structure.
> @@ -108,6 +109,10 @@ extern int driver_probe_device(struct device_driver *drv, struct device *dev);
>  static inline int driver_match_device(struct device_driver *drv,
>  				      struct device *dev)
>  {
> +	if (isolation_group_managed(to_isolation_group(dev)) &&
> +	    !isolation_group_manager_driver(to_isolation_group(dev), drv))
> +		return 0;
> +
>  	return drv->bus->match ? drv->bus->match(dev, drv) : 1;
>  }
>  
> diff --git a/drivers/base/isolation.c b/drivers/base/isolation.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..c01365c
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/base/isolation.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,798 @@
> +/*
> + * Isolation group interface
> + *
> + * Copyright (C) 2012 Red Hat, Inc. All rights reserved.
> + * Author: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>
> + *
> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
> + * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as
> + * published by the Free Software Foundation.
> + *
> + */
> +
> +#include <linux/device.h>
> +#include <linux/iommu.h>
> +#include <linux/isolation.h>
> +#include <linux/list.h>
> +#include <linux/mutex.h>
> +#include <linux/notifier.h>
> +#include <linux/slab.h>
> +#include <linux/uuid.h>
> +
> +static struct kset *isolation_kset;
> +/* XXX add more complete locking, maybe rcu */
> +static DEFINE_MUTEX(isolation_lock);
> +static LIST_HEAD(isolation_groups);
> +static LIST_HEAD(isolation_notifiers);
> +
> +/* Keep these private */
> +struct isolation_manager_driver {
> +	struct device_driver *drv;
> +	struct list_head list;
> +};
> +
> +struct isolation_manager {
> +	struct list_head drivers;
> +	/* Likely need managers to register some callbacks */
> +};
> +
> +struct isolation_group {
> +	struct list_head list;
> +	struct list_head devices;
> +	struct kobject kobj;
> +	struct kobject *devices_kobj;
> +	struct iommu_domain *iommu_domain;
> +	struct iommu_ops *iommu_ops;
> +	struct isolation_manager *manager;
> +	uuid_le uuid;
> +};
> +
> +struct isolation_device {
> +	struct device *dev;
> +	struct list_head list;
> +};
> +
> +struct isolation_notifier {
> +	struct bus_type *bus;
> +	struct notifier_block nb;
> +	struct blocking_notifier_head notifier;
> +	struct list_head list;
> +	int refcnt;
> +};
> +
> +struct iso_attribute {
> +	struct attribute attr;
> +	ssize_t (*show)(struct isolation_group *group, char *buf);
> +	ssize_t (*store)(struct isolation_group *group,
> +			 const char *buf, size_t count);
> +};
> +
> +#define to_iso_attr(_attr) container_of(_attr, struct iso_attribute, attr)
> +#define to_iso_group(_kobj) container_of(_kobj, struct isolation_group, kobj)
> +
> +static ssize_t iso_attr_show(struct kobject *kobj, struct attribute *attr,
> +			     char *buf)
> +{
> +	struct iso_attribute *iso_attr = to_iso_attr(attr);
> +	struct isolation_group *group = to_iso_group(kobj);
> +	ssize_t ret = -EIO;
> +
> +	if (iso_attr->show)
> +		ret = iso_attr->show(group, buf);
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static ssize_t iso_attr_store(struct kobject *kobj, struct attribute *attr,
> +			      const char *buf, size_t count)
> +{
> +	struct iso_attribute *iso_attr = to_iso_attr(attr);
> +	struct isolation_group *group = to_iso_group(kobj);
> +	ssize_t ret = -EIO;
> +
> +	if (iso_attr->store)
> +		ret = iso_attr->store(group, buf, count);
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static void iso_release(struct kobject *kobj)
> +{
> +	struct isolation_group *group = to_iso_group(kobj);
> +	kfree(group);
> +}
> +
> +static const struct sysfs_ops iso_sysfs_ops = {
> +	.show = iso_attr_show,
> +	.store = iso_attr_store,
> +};
> +
> +static struct kobj_type iso_ktype = {
> +	.sysfs_ops = &iso_sysfs_ops,
> +	.release = iso_release,
> +};
> +
> +/*
> + * Create an isolation group.  Isolation group "providers" register a
> + * notifier for their bus(es) and call this to create a new isolation
> + * group.
> + */
> +struct isolation_group *isolation_create_group(void)
> +{
> +	struct isolation_group *group, *tmp;
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	if (unlikely(!isolation_kset))
> +		return ERR_PTR(-ENODEV);
> +
> +	group = kzalloc(sizeof(*group), GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!group)
> +		return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
> +
> +	mutex_lock(&isolation_lock);
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * Use a UUID for group identification simply because it seems wrong
> +	 * to expose it as a kernel pointer (%p).  Neither is user friendly.
> +	 * Mostly only expect userspace to do anything with this.
> +	 */

So, my plan was to require the isolation provider to give a unique
name - it can construct something that's actually meaningful (and with
luck, stable across boots).  For Power we'd use the PE number, for
VT-d, I was thinking the PCI device address would do it (of the "base"
device for the non-separable bridge and broken multifunction cases).

> +new_uuid:
> +	uuid_le_gen(&group->uuid);
> +
> +	/* Unlikely, but nothing prevents duplicates */
> +	list_for_each_entry(tmp, &isolation_groups, list)
> +		if (memcmp(&group->uuid, &tmp->uuid, sizeof(group->uuid)) == 0)
> +			goto new_uuid;
> +
> +	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&group->devices);
> +	group->kobj.kset = isolation_kset;
> +
> +	ret = kobject_init_and_add(&group->kobj, &iso_ktype, NULL,
> +				   "%pUl", &group->uuid);

Um.. isn't this setting the kobject name to the address of the uuid
plus "Ul", not the content of the uuid?

> +	if (ret) {
> +		kfree(group);
> +		mutex_unlock(&isolation_lock);
> +		return ERR_PTR(ret);
> +	}
> +
> +	/* Add a subdirectory to save links for devices withing the group. */
> +	group->devices_kobj = kobject_create_and_add("devices", &group->kobj);
> +	if (!group->devices_kobj) {
> +		kobject_put(&group->kobj);
> +		mutex_unlock(&isolation_lock);
> +		return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
> +	}
> +
> +	list_add(&group->list, &isolation_groups);
> +
> +	mutex_unlock(&isolation_lock);
> +
> +	return group;
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * Free isolation group.  XXX need to cleanup/reject based on manager status.
> + */
> +int isolation_free_group(struct isolation_group *group)
> +{
> +	mutex_lock(&isolation_lock);
> +
> +	if (!list_empty(&group->devices)) {
> +		mutex_unlock(&isolation_lock);
> +		return -EBUSY;
> +	}
> +
> +	list_del(&group->list);
> +	kobject_put(group->devices_kobj);
> +	kobject_put(&group->kobj);
> +
> +	mutex_unlock(&isolation_lock);
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * Add a device to an isolation group.  Isolation groups start empty and
> + * must be told about the devices they contain.  Expect this to be called
> + * from isolation group providers via notifier.
> + */

Doesn't necessarily have to be from a notifier, particularly if the
provider is integrated into host bridge code.

> +int isolation_group_add_dev(struct isolation_group *group, struct device *dev)
> +{
> +	struct isolation_device *device;
> +	int ret = 0;
> +
> +	mutex_lock(&isolation_lock);
> +
> +	if (dev->isolation_group) {
> +		ret = -EBUSY;
> +		goto out;

This should probably be a BUG_ON() - the isolation provider shouldn't
be putting the same device into two different groups.

> +	}
> +
> +	device = kzalloc(sizeof(*device), GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!device) {
> +		ret = -ENOMEM;
> +		goto out;
> +	}
> +
> +	device->dev = dev;
> +
> +	/* Cross link the device in sysfs */
> +	ret = sysfs_create_link(&dev->kobj, &group->kobj,
> +				"isolation_group");
> +	if (ret) {
> +		kfree(device);
> +		goto out;
> +	}
> +	
> +	ret = sysfs_create_link(group->devices_kobj, &dev->kobj,
> +				kobject_name(&dev->kobj));

So, a problem both here and in my version is what to name the device
links.  Because they could be potentially be quite widely scattered,
I'm not sure that kobject_name() is guaranteed to be sufficiently
unique.

> +	if (ret) {
> +		sysfs_remove_link(&dev->kobj, "isolation_group");
> +		kfree(device);
> +		goto out;
> +	}
> +
> +	list_add(&device->list, &group->devices);
> +
> +	dev->isolation_group = group;
> +
> +	if (group->iommu_domain) {
> +		ret = group->iommu_ops->attach_dev(group->iommu_domain, dev);
> +		if (ret) {
> +			/* XXX fail device? */
> +		}

So, I presume the idea is that this is a stop-gap until iommu_ops is
converted to be in terms of groups rather than indivdual devices?

> +	}
> +
> +	/* XXX signal manager? */

Uh, what did you have in mind here?

> +out:
> +	mutex_unlock(&isolation_lock);
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * Remove a device from an isolation group, likely because the device
> + * went away.
> + */
> +int isolation_group_del_dev(struct device *dev)
> +{
> +	struct isolation_group *group = dev->isolation_group;
> +	struct isolation_device *device;
> +
> +	if (!group)
> +		return -ENODEV;
> +
> +	mutex_lock(&isolation_lock);
> +
> +	list_for_each_entry(device, &group->devices, list) {
> +		if (device->dev == dev) {
> +			/* XXX signal manager? */
> +
> +			if (group->iommu_domain)
> +				group->iommu_ops->detach_dev(
> +					group->iommu_domain, dev);
> +			list_del(&device->list);
> +			kfree(device);
> +			dev->isolation_group = NULL;
> +			sysfs_remove_link(group->devices_kobj,
> +					  kobject_name(&dev->kobj));
> +			sysfs_remove_link(&dev->kobj, "isolation_group");
> +			break;
> +		}
> +	}
> +			
> +	mutex_unlock(&isolation_lock);
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * Filter and call out to our own notifier chains
> + */

So, I haven't quite worked out what this isolation notifier
infrastructure gives you, as opposed to having isolation providers
directly register bus notifiers.

> +static int isolation_bus_notify(struct notifier_block *nb,
> +				unsigned long action, void *data)
> +{
> +	struct isolation_notifier *notifier =
> +		container_of(nb, struct isolation_notifier, nb);
> +	struct device *dev = data;
> +
> +	switch (action) {
> +	case BUS_NOTIFY_ADD_DEVICE:
> +		if (!dev->isolation_group)
> +			blocking_notifier_call_chain(&notifier->notifier,
> +					ISOLATION_NOTIFY_ADD_DEVICE, dev);
> +		break;
> +	case BUS_NOTIFY_DEL_DEVICE:
> +		if (dev->isolation_group)
> +			blocking_notifier_call_chain(&notifier->notifier,
> +					ISOLATION_NOTIFY_DEL_DEVICE, dev);
> +		break;
> +	}
> +
> +	return NOTIFY_DONE;
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * Wrapper for manual playback of BUS_NOTIFY_ADD_DEVICE when we add
> + * a new notifier.
> + */
> +static int isolation_do_add_notify(struct device *dev, void *data)
> +{
> +	struct notifier_block *nb = data;
> +
> +	if (!dev->isolation_group)
> +		nb->notifier_call(nb, ISOLATION_NOTIFY_ADD_DEVICE, dev);
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * Register a notifier.  This is for isolation group providers.  It's
> + * possible we could have multiple isolation group providers for the same
> + * bus type,

So the bit above doesn't seem to connect to the bit below.  We can
indeed have multiple isolation providers for one bus type, but the
below seems to be covering the (also possible, but different) case of
one isolation provider covering multiple bus types.

> so we create a struct isolation_notifier per bus_type, each
> + * with a notifier block.  Providers are therefore welcome to register
> + * as many buses as they can handle.
> + */
> +int isolation_register_notifier(struct bus_type *bus, struct notifier_block *nb)
> +{
> +	struct isolation_notifier *notifier;
> +	bool found = false;
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	mutex_lock(&isolation_lock);
> +	list_for_each_entry(notifier, &isolation_notifiers, list) {
> +		if (notifier->bus == bus) {
> +			found = true;
> +			break;
> +		}
> +	}
> +
> +	if (!found) {
> +		notifier = kzalloc(sizeof(*notifier), GFP_KERNEL);
> +		if (!notifier) {
> +			mutex_unlock(&isolation_lock);
> +			return -ENOMEM;	
> +		}
> +		notifier->bus = bus;
> +		notifier->nb.notifier_call = isolation_bus_notify;
> +		BLOCKING_INIT_NOTIFIER_HEAD(&notifier->notifier);
> +		bus_register_notifier(bus, &notifier->nb);
> +		list_add(&notifier->list, &isolation_notifiers);
> +	}
> +
> +	ret = blocking_notifier_chain_register(&notifier->notifier, nb);
> +	if (ret) {
> +		if (notifier->refcnt == 0) {
> +			bus_unregister_notifier(bus, &notifier->nb);
> +			list_del(&notifier->list);
> +			kfree(notifier);
> +		}
> +		mutex_unlock(&isolation_lock);
> +		return ret;
> +	}
> +	notifier->refcnt++;
> +
> +	mutex_unlock(&isolation_lock);
> +
> +	bus_for_each_dev(bus, NULL, nb, isolation_do_add_notify);
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}

So, somewhere, I think we need a fallback path, but I'm not sure
exactly where.  If an isolation provider doesn't explicitly put a
device into a group, the device should go into the group of its parent
bridge.  This covers the case of a bus with IOMMU which has below it a
bridge to a different type of DMA capable bus (which the IOMMU isn't
explicitly aware of).  DMAs from devices on the subordinate bus can be
translated by the top-level IOMMU (assuming it sees them as coming
from the bridge), but they all need to be treated as one group.

> +/*
> + * Unregister...
> + */
> +int isolation_unregister_notifier(struct bus_type *bus,
> +				  struct notifier_block *nb)
> +{
> +	struct isolation_notifier *notifier;
> +	bool found = false;
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	mutex_lock(&isolation_lock);
> +	list_for_each_entry(notifier, &isolation_notifiers, list) {
> +		if (notifier->bus == bus) {
> +			found = true;
> +			break;
> +		}
> +	}
> +
> +	if (!found) {
> +		mutex_unlock(&isolation_lock);
> +		return -ENODEV;
> +	}
> +
> +	ret = blocking_notifier_chain_unregister(&notifier->notifier, nb);
> +	if (ret) {
> +		mutex_unlock(&isolation_lock);
> +		return ret;
> +	}
> +
> +	/* Free at nobody left in the notifier block */
> +	if (--notifier->refcnt == 0) {
> +		bus_unregister_notifier(bus, &notifier->nb);
> +		list_del(&notifier->list);
> +		kfree(notifier);
> +	}
> +
> +	mutex_unlock(&isolation_lock);
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * Set iommu_ops on an isolation group.  Hopefully all DMA will eventually
> + * be done through isolation groups, for now, we just provide another
> + * interface to the iommu api.
> + */
> +int isolation_group_set_iommu_ops(struct isolation_group *group,
> +				  struct iommu_ops *iommu_ops)
> +{
> +	mutex_lock(&isolation_lock);
> +
> +	if (group->iommu_ops) {
> +		mutex_unlock(&isolation_lock);
> +		return -EBUSY;
> +	}
> +
> +	group->iommu_ops = iommu_ops;
> +
> +	mutex_unlock(&isolation_lock);
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * Attach all the devices for a group to the specified iommu domain.
> + */
> +static int __isolation_group_domain_attach_devs(struct iommu_domain *domain,
> +					        struct list_head *devices)
> +{
> +	struct isolation_device *device;
> +	struct device *dev;
> +	int ret = 0;
> +
> +	list_for_each_entry(device, devices, list) {
> +		dev = device->dev;
> +
> +		ret = domain->ops->attach_dev(domain, dev);
> +		if (ret) {
> +			list_for_each_entry_continue_reverse(device,
> +							     devices, list) {
> +				dev = device->dev;
> +				domain->ops->detach_dev(domain, dev);
> +			}
> +			break;
> +		}
> +	}
> +
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * And detach...
> + */
> +static void __isolation_group_domain_detach_devs(struct iommu_domain *domain,
> +						 struct list_head *devices)
> +{
> +	struct isolation_device *device;
> +	struct device *dev;
> +
> +	list_for_each_entry(device, devices, list) {
> +		dev = device->dev;
> +
> +		domain->ops->detach_dev(domain, dev);
> +	}
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * Initialize the iommu domain for an isolation group.  This is to ease the
> + * transition to using isolation groups and expected to be used by current
> + * users of the iommu api for now.
> + */
> +int isolation_group_init_iommu_domain(struct isolation_group *group)
> +{
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	mutex_lock(&isolation_lock);
> +
> +	if (!group->iommu_ops || list_empty(&group->devices)) {
> +		mutex_unlock(&isolation_lock);
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +	}
> +
> +	if (group->iommu_domain) {
> +		mutex_unlock(&isolation_lock);
> +		return -EBUSY;
> +	}
> +
> +	group->iommu_domain = kzalloc(sizeof(struct iommu_domain), GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!group->iommu_domain) {
> +		mutex_unlock(&isolation_lock);
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +	}
> +
> +	group->iommu_domain->ops = group->iommu_ops;
> +
> +	ret = group->iommu_ops->domain_init(group->iommu_domain);
> +	if (ret) {
> +		kfree(group->iommu_domain);
> +		group->iommu_domain = NULL;
> +		mutex_unlock(&isolation_lock);
> +		return ret;
> +	}
> +
> +	/* Automatically attach all the devices in the group. */
> +	ret = __isolation_group_domain_attach_devs(group->iommu_domain,
> +						   &group->devices);
> +	if (ret) {
> +		group->iommu_ops->domain_destroy(group->iommu_domain);
> +		kfree(group->iommu_domain);
> +		group->iommu_domain = NULL;
> +		mutex_unlock(&isolation_lock);
> +		return ret;
> +	}
> +		
> +	mutex_unlock(&isolation_lock);
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * And free...
> + * Note just below, we add the ability to add another group to an iommu
> + * domain, so we don't always destroy and free the domain here.
> + */
> +void isolation_group_free_iommu_domain(struct isolation_group *group)
> +{
> +	struct isolation_group *tmp;
> +	bool inuse = false;
> +
> +	if (!group->iommu_domain || !group->iommu_ops)
> +		return;
> +
> +	mutex_lock(&isolation_lock);
> +
> +	__isolation_group_domain_detach_devs(group->iommu_domain,
> +					     &group->devices);
> +
> +	list_for_each_entry(tmp, &isolation_groups, list) {
> +		if (tmp == group)
> +			continue;
> +		if (tmp->iommu_domain == group->iommu_domain) {
> +			inuse = true;
> +			break;
> +		}
> +	}
> +
> +	if (!inuse) {
> +		group->iommu_ops->domain_destroy(group->iommu_domain);
> +		kfree(group->iommu_domain);
> +	}
> +
> +	group->iommu_domain = NULL;
> +
> +	mutex_unlock(&isolation_lock);
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * This handles the VFIO "merge" interface, allowing us to manage multiple
> + * isolation groups with a single domain.  We just rely on attach_dev to
> + * tell us whether this is ok.
> + */
> +int isolation_group_iommu_domain_add_group(struct isolation_group *groupa,
> +					   struct isolation_group *groupb)
> +{
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	if (!groupa->iommu_domain ||
> +	    groupb->iommu_domain || list_empty(&groupb->devices))
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	if (groupa->iommu_ops != groupb->iommu_ops)
> +		return -EIO;
> +
> +	mutex_lock(&isolation_lock);
> +
> +	ret = __isolation_group_domain_attach_devs(groupa->iommu_domain,
> +						   &groupb->devices);
> +	if (ret) {
> +		mutex_unlock(&isolation_lock);
> +		return ret;
> +	}
> +
> +	groupb->iommu_domain = groupa->iommu_domain;
> +
> +	mutex_unlock(&isolation_lock);
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * XXX page mapping/unmapping and more iommu api wrappers
> + */
> +
> +/*
> + * Do we have a group manager?  Group managers restrict what drivers are
> + * allowed to attach to devices.  A group is "locked" when all of the devices
> + * for a group belong to group manager drivers (or no driver at all).  At
> + * that point, the group manager can initialize the iommu.  vfio is an example
> + * of a group manager and vfio-pci is an exanple of a driver that a group
> + * manager may add as a "managed" driver.  Note that we don't gate iommu
> + * manipulation on being managed because we want to use it for regular DMA
> + * at some point as well.
> + */
> +bool isolation_group_managed(struct isolation_group *group)
> +{
> +	return group->manager != NULL;
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * Initialize the group manager struct.  At this point the isolation group
> + * becomes "managed".
> + */

This assumes a separate manager struct for each group.  I would have
thought the VFIO merge case would be more obviously represented by
having a single manager struct for all the groups in the VFIO instance
(== iommu domain).

> +int isolation_group_init_manager(struct isolation_group *group)
> +{
> +	mutex_lock(&isolation_lock);
> +
> +	if (group->manager) {
> +		mutex_unlock(&isolation_lock);
> +		return -EBUSY;
> +	}
> +
> +	group->manager = kzalloc(sizeof(struct isolation_manager), GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!group->manager) {
> +		mutex_unlock(&isolation_lock);
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +	}
> +
> +	mutex_unlock(&isolation_lock);
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * And free... cleanup registerd managed drivers too.
> + */
> +void isolation_group_free_manager(struct isolation_group *group)
> +{
> +	struct isolation_manager_driver *driver, *tmp;
> +
> +	if (!group->manager)
> +		return;
> +
> +	mutex_lock(&isolation_lock);
> +
> +	list_for_each_entry_safe(driver, tmp, &group->manager->drivers, list) {
> +		list_del(&driver->list);
> +		kfree(driver);
> +	}
> +		
> +	kfree(group->manager);
> +	group->manager = NULL;
> +	mutex_unlock(&isolation_lock);
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * Add a managed driver.  Drivers added here are the only ones that will
> + * be allowed to attach to a managed isolation group.
> + */
> +int isolation_group_manager_add_driver(struct isolation_group *group,
> +				       struct device_driver *drv)
> +{
> +	struct isolation_manager_driver *driver;
> +
> +	if (!group->manager)
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	driver = kzalloc(sizeof(*driver), GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!driver)
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +	driver->drv = drv;
> +
> +	mutex_lock(&isolation_lock);
> +
> +	list_add(&driver->list, &group->manager->drivers);
> +
> +	mutex_unlock(&isolation_lock);
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * And remove a driver.  Don't really expect to need this much.
> + */
> +void isolation_group_manager_del_driver(struct isolation_group *group,
> +				        struct device_driver *drv)
> +{
> +	struct isolation_manager_driver *driver;
> +
> +	if (!group->manager)
> +		return;
> +
> +	mutex_lock(&isolation_lock);
> +
> +	list_for_each_entry(driver, &group->manager->drivers, list) {
> +		if (driver->drv == drv) {
> +			list_del(&driver->list);
> +			kfree(driver);
> +			break;
> +		}
> +	}
> +
> +	mutex_unlock(&isolation_lock);
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * Test whether a driver is a "managed" driver for the group.  This allows
> + * is to preempt normal driver matching and only let our drivers in.
> + */
> +bool isolation_group_manager_driver(struct isolation_group *group,
> +				    struct device_driver *drv)
> +{
> +	struct isolation_manager_driver *driver;
> +	bool found = false;
> +
> +	if (!group->manager)
> +		return found;
> +
> +	mutex_lock(&isolation_lock);
> +
> +	list_for_each_entry(driver, &group->manager->drivers, list) {
> +		if (driver->drv == drv) {
> +			found = true;
> +			break;
> +		}
> +	}
> +
> +	mutex_unlock(&isolation_lock);
> +
> +	return found;
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * Does the group manager have control of all of the devices in the group?
> + * We consider driver-less devices to be ok here as they don't do DMA and
> + * don't present any interfaces to subvert the rest of the group.
> + */
> +bool isolation_group_manager_locked(struct isolation_group *group)
> +{
> +	struct isolation_device *device;
> +	struct isolation_manager_driver *driver;
> +	bool found, locked = true;
> +
> +	if (!group->manager)
> +		return false;
> +
> +	mutex_lock(&isolation_lock);
> +
> +	list_for_each_entry(device, &group->devices, list) {
> +		found = false;
> +
> +		if (!device->dev->driver)
> +			continue;
> +

You could simplify this using isolation_group_manager_driver(),
couldn't you?

> +		list_for_each_entry(driver, &group->manager->drivers, list) {
> +			if (device->dev->driver == driver->drv) {
> +				found = true;
> +				break;
> +			}
> +		}
> +
> +		if (!found) {
> +			locked = false;
> +			break;
> +		}
> +	}
> +
> +	mutex_unlock(&isolation_lock);
> +
> +	return locked;
> +}
> +
> +static int __init isolation_init(void)
> +{
> +	isolation_kset = kset_create_and_add("isolation", NULL, NULL);
> +	
> +	WARN(!isolation_kset, "Failed to initialize isolation group kset\n");
> +
> +	return isolation_kset ? 0 : -1;

I'd be tempted to just BUG() here if you can't add the kset - I can't
see any reason it would fail unless you're so short of RAM that you
have bigger problems.  Making this a fatal fail would save having to
double check if the kset is around in the later paths.

> +}
> +subsys_initcall(isolation_init);
> diff --git a/include/linux/device.h b/include/linux/device.h
> index b63fb39..5805c56 100644
> --- a/include/linux/device.h
> +++ b/include/linux/device.h
> @@ -663,6 +663,10 @@ struct device {
>  
>  	struct device_dma_parameters *dma_parms;
>  
> +#ifdef CONFIG_ISOLATION_GROUPS
> +	struct isolation_group	*isolation_group;
> +#endif
> +
>  	struct list_head	dma_pools;	/* dma pools (if dma'ble) */
>  
>  	struct dma_coherent_mem	*dma_mem; /* internal for coherent mem
> diff --git a/include/linux/isolation.h b/include/linux/isolation.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..1d87caf
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/include/linux/isolation.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,138 @@
> +/*
> + * Isolation group interface
> + *
> + * Copyright (C) 2012 Red Hat, Inc. All rights reserved.
> + * Author: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>
> + *
> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
> + * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as
> + * published by the Free Software Foundation.
> + *
> + */
> +
> +#ifndef _LINUX_ISOLATION_H
> +#define _LINUX_ISOLATION_H
> +
> +#define ISOLATION_NOTIFY_ADD_DEVICE	1
> +#define ISOLATION_NOTIFY_DEL_DEVICE	2
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_ISOLATION_GROUPS
> +
> +extern struct isolation_group *isolation_create_group(void);
> +extern int isolation_free_group(struct isolation_group *group);
> +extern int isolation_group_add_dev(struct isolation_group *group,
> +				   struct device *dev);
> +extern int isolation_group_del_dev(struct device *dev);
> +extern int isolation_register_notifier(struct bus_type *bus,
> +				       struct notifier_block *nb);
> +extern int isolation_unregister_notifier(struct bus_type *bus,
> +					 struct notifier_block *nb);
> +extern int isolation_group_set_iommu_ops(struct isolation_group *group,
> +					 struct iommu_ops *iommu_ops);
> +extern int isolation_group_init_iommu_domain(struct isolation_group *group);
> +extern void isolation_group_free_iommu_domain(struct isolation_group *group);
> +extern int isolation_group_iommu_domain_add_group(
> +	struct isolation_group *groupa, struct isolation_group *groupb);
> +extern bool isolation_group_managed(struct isolation_group *group);
> +extern int isolation_group_init_manager(struct isolation_group *group);
> +extern void isolation_group_free_manager(struct isolation_group *group);
> +extern int isolation_group_manager_add_driver(struct isolation_group *group,
> +					      struct device_driver *drv);
> +extern void isolation_group_manager_del_driver(struct isolation_group *group,
> +					       struct device_driver *drv);
> +extern bool isolation_group_manager_driver(struct isolation_group *group,
> +					   struct device_driver *drv);
> +extern bool isolation_group_manager_locked(struct isolation_group *group);
> +
> +#define to_isolation_group(dev)	((dev)->isolation_group)
> +
> +#else /* CONFIG_ISOLATION_GROUPS */
> +
> +static inline struct isolation_group *isolation_create_group(void)
> +{
> +	return NULL;
> +}
> +
> +static inline int isolation_free_group(struct isolation_group *group)
> +{
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static inline int isolation_group_add_dev(struct isolation_group *group,
> +					  struct device *dev)
> +{
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static inline int isolation_group_del_dev(struct device *dev)
> +{
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int isolation_register_notifier(struct bus_type *bus,
> +				       struct notifier_block *nb)
> +{
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int isolation_unregister_notifier(struct bus_type *bus,
> +					 struct notifier_block *nb)
> +{
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int isolation_group_set_iommu_ops(struct isolation_group *group,
> +					 struct iommu_ops *iommu_ops)
> +{
> +	return -ENOSYS;
> +}
> +
> +static int isolation_group_init_iommu_domain(struct isolation_group *group)
> +{
> +	return -ENOSYS;
> +}
> +
> +static void isolation_group_free_iommu_domain(struct isolation_group *group)
> +{
> +}
> +
> +static int isolation_group_iommu_domain_add_group(
> +	struct isolation_group *groupa, struct isolation_group *groupb)
> +{
> +	return -ENOSYS;
> +}
> +
> +static int isolation_group_init_manager(struct isolation_group *group)
> +{
> +	return -ENOSYS;
> +}
> +
> +static void isolation_group_free_manager(struct isolation_group *group)
> +{
> +}
> +
> +static int isolation_group_manager_add_driver(struct isolation_group *group,
> +					      struct device_driver *drv)
> +{
> +	return -ENOSYS;
> +}
> +
> +static void isolation_group_manager_del_driver(struct isolation_group *group,
> +					       struct device_driver *drv)
> +{
> +}
> +
> +static bool isolation_group_manager_locked(struct isolation_group *group)
> +{
> +	return false;
> +}
> +
> +#define to_isolation_group(dev)	(NULL)
> +
> +#define isolation_group_managed(group) (false)
> +
> +#define isolation_group_manager_driver(group, drv) (false)
> +
> +#endif /* CONFIG_ISOLATION_GROUPS */
> +
> +#endif /* _LINUX_ISOLATION_H */
> 

-- 
David Gibson			| I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au	| minimalist, thank you.  NOT _the_ _other_
				| _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists