| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20120313152417.GA12193@elte.hu> Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2012 16:24:17 +0100 From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl> Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung.kim@....com>, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net>, Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...il.com>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] perf report: Treat an argument as a symbol filter * Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl> wrote: > On Tue, 2012-03-13 at 07:21 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > To play the devil's advocate it uses up valuable perf report > > command line real estate and we probably cannot change this > > workflow in the future, once people get used to it. > > I would indeed suggest to make it a proper argument and add > argument parsing to report like we have for all the other > commands. > > Say something like: perf report --symbol-filter="foobar" and > maybe an appropriate short version. No objection against also having a command line option, but I really like the Git way of doing things like: git remote update tip where it's several layers of commands plus arguments, with no silly command switch names to remember. Thanks, Ingo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists