linux-kernel - Re: [RFD] cgroup: about multiple hierarchies

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20120313160218.GC7349@google.com>
Date:	Tue, 13 Mar 2012 09:02:18 -0700
From:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To:	Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>
Cc:	Li Zefan <lizf@...fujitsu.com>,
	containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org, cgroups@...r.kernel.org,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@...y.org>,
	Lennart Poettering <lennart@...ttering.net>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Michal Schmidt <mschmidt@...hat.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [RFD] cgroup: about multiple hierarchies

Hello,

On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 09:49:22AM -0400, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> So everything will be under single hierarchy? How will we control that
> what controllers are active on what cgroups? Or all controllers are going
> to be active on all cgroups on that hierarchy. 
> 
> That would be bad for IO cgroups where a better way to use it to isolate
> the trouble making workload and run rest in root or a common cgroup.

Depending on active configs, I guess, or maybe we'll have active
controllers mask which can also be used for single-level restriction
for controllers which don't support full hierarchy.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/