linux-kernel - Re: [Xen-devel] [Pkg-xen-devel] ioatdma: Boot process hangs then reboots when using Xen + Linux 3.2

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20120313164902.GF19228@phenom.dumpdata.com>
Date:	Tue, 13 Mar 2012 12:49:02 -0400
From:	Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>
To:	Ian Campbell <ijc@...lion.org.uk>
Cc:	Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
	xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com, Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@...el.com>,
	pkg-xen-devel@...ts.alioth.debian.org,
	Thomas Goirand <zigo@...ian.org>,
	Maciej Sosnowski <maciej.sosnowski@...el.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@...il.com>,
	William Dauchy <wdauchy@...il.com>,
	Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad@...nok.org>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [Pkg-xen-devel] ioatdma: Boot process hangs then
 reboots when using Xen + Linux 3.2

On Tue, Mar 06, 2012 at 06:39:12AM -0800, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-03-06 at 06:14 -0800, Dan Williams wrote:
> > [    9.276817] ioatdma 0000:00:16.4: desc[0]:
> > (0x300cc7000->0x300cc7040) cookie: 0 flags: 0x2 ctl: 0x29 (op: 0
> > int_en: 1 compl: 1)
> > ...
> > [    9.276832] ioatdma 0000:00:16.4: ioat_get_current_completion:
> > phys_complete: 0xcc7000
> > 
> > Thanks, this clearly shows that our descriptors are above 4GB and that
> > the driver truncates the completion word.
> > 
> > Is this new behavior for xen?
> 
> Xen makes a distinction between physical addresses and DMA addresses and
> the latter can potentially be anywhere in the machine's real address
> space while the former is what GFP_KERNEL etc controls.
> 
> You are using pci_pool_alloc which is the correct API to use for these
> things since it's purpose is to handle cases where PHYS != DMA addr by
> exposing the DMA address to the caller. As part of that you should also
> be using dma_addr_t for DMA addresses since that is the type which is
> defined to handle the appropriate DMA address size on the platform.
> 
> I think this DMA!=PHYS can also be true of some non-x86 architectures

Especially SPARC.
> without Xen too but I guess ioat is quite x86 specific? In any case it
> is wrong, or at least non-portable, to use unsigned long for these
> addresses even though it happens on x86 that physaddr == dma addr
> (usually).

I think with the Intel VT-d that can be different. The bus addresses returned
do seem different.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/