| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2012 13:04:58 -0400 From: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com> To: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com> Cc: Shaohua Li <shli@...ionio.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-raid@...r.kernel.org, neilb@...e.de, axboe@...nel.dk, "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com> Subject: Re: [patch 6/7] blk: add plug for blkdev_issue_discard >>>>> "Vivek" == Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com> writes: Vivek> On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 11:04:18AM +0800, Shaohua Li wrote: >> In raid 0 case, a big discard request is divided into several small >> requests in chunk_size unit. Such requests can be merged in low layer >> if we have correct plug added. This should improve the performance a >> little bit. Vivek> Martin posted a patch to remove the support for allowing merging Vivek> of discard requests. But this seems to be a reasonable use case Vivek> for allowing mering discard requests. CCing Martin. Merging discard requests is hard given how we need to prepare the command payload at the bottom of the stack. The current upstream merge code pretends to be working but it actually doesn't. That's why I want it dead and buried. I have some changes pending (that I need for the REQ_COPY support) that will make merging of non-rw requests easier to deal with. But that's a kernel release cycle away... -- Martin K. Petersen Oracle Linux Engineering -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists