[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120313175356.GB1708@cmpxchg.org>
Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2012 18:53:56 +0100
From: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
To: Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@...nvz.org>,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Ying Han <yinghan@...gle.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3.3] memcg: free mem_cgroup by RCU to fix oops
On Wed, Mar 07, 2012 at 10:01:50PM -0800, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> After fixing the GPF in mem_cgroup_lru_del_list(), three times one
> machine running a similar load (moving and removing memcgs while swapping)
> has oopsed in mem_cgroup_zone_nr_lru_pages(), when retrieving memcg zone
> numbers for get_scan_count() for shrink_mem_cgroup_zone(): this is where a
> struct mem_cgroup is first accessed after being chosen by mem_cgroup_iter().
>
> Just what protects a struct mem_cgroup from being freed, in between
> mem_cgroup_iter()'s css_get_next() and its css_tryget()? css_tryget()
> fails once css->refcnt is zero with CSS_REMOVED set in flags, yes: but
> what if that memory is freed and reused for something else, which sets
> "refcnt" non-zero? Hmm, and scope for an indefinite freeze if refcnt
> is left at zero but flags are cleared.
>
> It's tempting to move the css_tryget() into css_get_next(), to make it
> really "get" the css, but I don't think that actually solves anything:
> the same difficulty in moving from css_id found to stable css remains.
I don't think so, either, as long as the css_id can be found after the
synchronize_rcu() between freezing the refcount and freeing the group.
> But we already have rcu_read_lock() around the two, so it's easily
> fixed if __mem_cgroup_free() just uses kfree_rcu() to free mem_cgroup.
>
> However, a big struct mem_cgroup is allocated with vzalloc() instead
> of kzalloc(), and we're not allowed to vfree() at interrupt time:
> there doesn't appear to be a general vfree_rcu() to help with this,
> so roll our own using schedule_work(). The compiler decently removes
> vfree_work() and vfree_rcu() when the config doesn't need them.
>
> Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>
Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists