[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120313211758.GA10168@kroah.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2012 14:17:58 -0700
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: David Daney <ddaney.cavm@...il.com>
Cc: linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
David Daney <david.daney@...ium.com>,
Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] usb: Don't make USB_ARCH_HAS_OHCI and USB_ARCH_HAS_EHCI
depend on USB_SUPPORT.
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 12:01:44PM -0700, David Daney wrote:
> From: David Daney <david.daney@...ium.com>
>
> The fact that an architecture/board has OHCI or EHCI does not depend on
> the fact that the kernel is configured with USB_SUPPORT.
Why are you ignoring XHCI here as well? Shouldn't that fall under the
same rules as OHCI and EHCI (hint, they should...)
thanks,
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists