lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2012 14:28:39 -0700 From: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org> To: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com> Cc: CAI Qian <caiqian@...hat.com>, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: crash dump memory reservation regression On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 7:26 AM, Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com> wrote: > On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 10:31:21PM -0700, Yinghai Lu wrote: > > > So as long as we can reserve till 512MB of kdump memory, that should allow > us to support up to 6TB of systems with dump filtering. Hopefully that is > sufficient for quite some time and we don't have to take the path of > supporting non-contiguous memory for kdump. one or two years later, there may be x86_system more than 16T? Yinghai -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists