lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4F5FD021.1080409@gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 13 Mar 2012 15:54:25 -0700
From:	Dirk Brandewie <dirk.brandewie@...il.com>
To:	Anton Vorontsov <cbouatmailru@...il.com>
CC:	dirk.brandewie@...il.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	dg77.kim@...sung.com, kyungmin.park@...sung.com,
	myungjoo.ham@...sung.com, Jason.Wortham@...im-ic.com,
	bruce.e.robertson@...el.com,
	Karol Lewandowski <k.lewandowsk@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] max17042: Change capacity property to use reported
 SOC register

On 03/13/2012 11:34 AM, Anton Vorontsov wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 09:26:08AM -0800, dirk.brandewie@...il.com wrote:
>> From: Dirk Brandewie<dirk.brandewie@...il.com>
>>
>> The SOC register (0dh) reports the state of charge before empty
>> compensation adjustments are applied.  The max value reported by this
>> register will decrease as the battery ages.
>>
>> Use the RepSOC register (06h) to report the capacity of the
>> battery. RepSOC contains a filtered version of the battery capacity
>> after empty compensation adjustments have been applied.
>>
>> Reported-by: Gary Keyes<gary.e.keyes@...el.com>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Dirk Brandewie<dirk.brandewie@...il.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/power/max17042_battery.c |    2 +-
>>   1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/power/max17042_battery.c b/drivers/power/max17042_battery.c
>> index 6e96b58..2194278 100644
>> --- a/drivers/power/max17042_battery.c
>> +++ b/drivers/power/max17042_battery.c
>> @@ -160,7 +160,7 @@ static int max17042_get_property(struct power_supply *psy,
>>   		break;
>>   	case POWER_SUPPLY_PROP_CAPACITY:
>>   		val->intval = max17042_read_reg(chip->client,
>> -				MAX17042_SOC) / 256;
>> +				MAX17042_RepSOC) / 256;
>
> Applied. But I don't get it: PROP_CAPACITY should report
> percents! And it looks that it reports something very
> different.
>

The resolution of the register is 1/256 of a percent so we are actually 
returning the value in percent.

> Also, if you look down the file, you'll see this:
>
>          case POWER_SUPPLY_PROP_CHARGE_FULL:
>                  ret = max17042_read_reg(chip->client, MAX17042_RepSOC);
>                  if (ret<  0)
>                          return ret;
>
>                  if ((ret>>  8)>= MAX17042_BATTERY_FULL)
>                          val->intval = 1;
>                  else if (ret>= 0)
>                          val->intval = 0;
>                  break;
>

I hadn't looked at this property. Looks like that code came from commit 60a1f6e4

> Wut? This is also wrong. PROP_CHARGE_FULL reports uAh, not "fully
> charged" boolean status.
>
> Please, read Documentation/power/power_supply_class.txt:
>
> ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~  Charge/Energy/Capacity - how to not confuse  ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
> ~                                                                       ~
> ~ Because both "charge" (µAh) and "energy" (µWh) represents "capacity"  ~
> ~ of battery, this class distinguish these terms. Don't mix them!       ~
> ~                                                                       ~
> ~ CHARGE_* attributes represents capacity in µAh only.                  ~
> ~ ENERGY_* attributes represents capacity in µWh only.                  ~
> ~ CAPACITY attribute represents capacity in *percents*, from 0 to 100.  ~
> ~                                                                       ~
> ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
>
> The driver is seriously broken, very. I'd even consider adding
> 'depends on BROKEN', as the driver might be the source of the
> confusion for drivers based on this one and for userland devs.
>
> Thanks,
>

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ