lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2012 10:48:17 +0800 From: Yongqiang Yang <xiaoqiangnk@...il.com> To: "Ted Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>, Phillip Susi <phillsusi@...il.com>, Andreas Dilger <adilger@...mcloud.com>, Lukas Czerner <lczerner@...hat.com>, Jacek Luczak <difrost.kernel@...il.com>, "linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org" <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>, linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org" <linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: getdents - ext4 vs btrfs performance What if we use inode number as the hash value? Does it work? Yongqiang. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists