linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Added backlight driver for Acer Aspire 4736

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 14 Mar 2012 13:51:18 +0800
From:	joeyli <jlee@...e.com>
To:	Pradeep Subrahmanion <subrahmanion.pradeep@...il.com>
Cc:	Matthew Garrett <mjg@...hat.com>, rpurdie@...ys.net,
	FlorianSchandinat@....de, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Added backlight driver for Acer Aspire 4736

於 三，2012-03-14 於 08:13 +0530，Pradeep Subrahmanion 提到：
> Hi Joey , 
> 
> > Per my understood, EC firmware should change brightness but didn't do
> > that, another
> > way is touch i915 register in _BCM.
> 
>   how do we do this ? you mean change the _BCM implementation ? 

"BIOS guy" should do something like this:

 Method (AINT, 2, NotSerialized)
{
...
        If (LEqual (Arg0, One))
        {
            Store (Divide (Multiply (Arg1, 0xFF), 0x64, ), BCLP)
            Or (BCLP, 0x80000000, BCLP)		<=== touch BCLP register
            Store (0x02, ASLC)
        }

    Method (_BCM, 1, NotSerialized)
    {
        If (LAnd (LGreaterEqual (Arg0, Zero), LLessEqual (Arg0, 0x64)))
        {
            AINT (One, Arg0)     <=== call AINT method
            Store (Arg0, BRTL)
        }
    }


Just for reference, they should do that when EC didn't wire to
backlight. 

> > 
> > Acer machine provide a broken _BCM implementation and they didn't test
> > it.
> > 
> > > > > By ' ACPI interface' , I mean 'acpi_video0' inside the
> > > > > /sys/class/backlight. I havn't tried the /sys/class/backlight interface
> > > > > directly . I will try that also.
> > > > 
> > > > So writing values into /sys/class/backlight/acpi_video0/brightness does 
> > > > nothing?
> > > 
> > > 
> > > No change in value when writing
> > > to /sys/class/backlight/acpi_video0/brightness.
> > > 
> > > Another thing is that when i did boot with acpi_backlight = 'acer_wmi' ,
> > > in new kernel (3.3.0-rc7) , it shows following messages , 
> > > 
> > > [    8.350825] wmi: Mapper loaded
> > > [   10.363975] acer_wmi: Acer Laptop ACPI-WMI Extras
> > > [   10.396186] acer_wmi: Function bitmap for Communication Device: 0x91
> > > [   10.396385] acer_wmi: Brightness must be controlled by generic video
> > > driver
> > > 
> > > Also there was no interface inside /sys/class/backlight for acer_wmi. 
> > > 
> > 
> > Yes, acer_wmi support backlight control with AMW0 interface, your
> > machine didn't have AMW0 interface.
> > 
> > Normally, backlight should control by standard acpi interface.
> > 
> > > I also tried writing directly to Embedded controller register .But no
> > > change.
> > 
> > The machine has broken _BCM method, because EC should do something after
> > _BCM changed EC register.
> 
> Thanks , 
> 
> Pradeep Subrahmanion

Why they didn't find _BCM not work?

My guess is:

Because the backlight control is through WDDM driver on Windows platform
but not through standard ACPI method _BCM. They only test Windows
platform, so, they didn't find _BCM broken.

And, they also didn't really follow Microsoft WDDM spec:

 http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/hardware/gg487382.aspx

Per spec,
ODM should keep _BCM works fine for any other OS didn't support WDDM
driver, but they didn't.

At last year, I told Acer PM one time for this issue, they said will
check but finally didn't response me.


Thanks
Joey Lee

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/