[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20120314114115.24e59318bdac705fec61bd89@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2012 11:41:15 +1100
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>
Cc: <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Russell King <rmk@....linux.org.uk>, tony@...eyournoodle.com
Subject: arm build failures (Was: linux-next: triage for March 13, 2012)
On Tue, 13 Mar 2012 19:47:07 -0400 Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com> wrote:
>
> ARM:netx_defconfig,pnx4008_defconfig
> when: Mar 14, 02:43
> why: net/core/pktgen.c: can't find a register in class 'GENERAL_REGS'
> status:
> fix:
> ref: http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/kisskb/buildresult/5869486/
This is this:
net/core/pktgen.c:682:2775: error: can't find a register in class 'GENERAL_REGS' while reloading 'asm'
net/core/pktgen.c:682:3153: error: can't find a register in class 'GENERAL_REGS' while reloading 'asm'
net/core/pktgen.c:682:2775: error: 'asm' operand has impossible constraints
net/core/pktgen.c:682:3153: error: 'asm' operand has impossible constraints
Which is a do_div() call. The relevant code does not appear to have
changed, so this may well be a result of our toolchain changing from
"arm-linux-gcc (GCC) 4.4.0, GNU ld (GNU Binutils) 2.19.1" to
"arm-unknown-linux-gnueabi-gcc (GCC) 4.6.3, GNU ld (GNU Binutils) 2.22".
Anyone have any thoughts?
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@...b.auug.org.au
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists