linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] mmc: sdhci: check interrupt flags in ISR again

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4F60638F.20300@intel.com>
Date:	Wed, 14 Mar 2012 11:23:27 +0200
From:	Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>
To:	Alexander Stein <alexander.stein@...tec-electronic.com>
CC:	Chris Ball <cjb@...top.org>,
	Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>,
	linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-pci@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] mmc: sdhci: check interrupt flags in ISR again

On 14/03/12 10:52, Alexander Stein wrote:
> When using MSI it is possible that a new MSI is sent while an earlier
> MSI is currently handled. In this case SDHCI_INT_STATUS only contains
> SDHCI_INT_RESPONSE and the ISR would not be called again. But at the end
> of the ISR SDHCI_INT_DATA_END is now also pending which would be ignored.
> 
> Fix this by rereading the interrupt flags in the ISR until no interrupt
> we care is pending.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Alexander Stein <alexander.stein@...tec-electronic.com>
> ---
> Changes in v2:
> * rearranged code a bit and added a maximum loop counter as suggested
>   by Adrian
> 
>  drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c |   19 ++++++++++++-------
>  1 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

Acked-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/