linux-kernel - Re: [patch] Adding Secure Deletion to UBIFS

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1331720835.2140.4.camel@sauron.fi.intel.com>
Date:	Wed, 14 Mar 2012 12:27:15 +0200
From:	Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@...il.com>
To:	Joel Reardon <joel@...mbassador.com>
Cc:	linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch] Adding Secure Deletion to UBIFS

On Wed, 2012-03-14 at 11:20 +0100, Joel Reardon wrote:
> For removing the key scheme notion, is it correct to remove:
> UBIFS_KEY_MAX_LEN and UBIFS_SK_, UBIFS_S_KEY_BLOCK_BITS, ... and replace
> it with a fixed UBIFS_KEY_LEN (and other values), thus also ignoring
> key_fmt in key_max_inode_size and simply use a fixed key scheme? Or should
> I simply reduce MAX_LEN to 8 but still allow multiple bit assignments
> within those 8 bytes via selecting a different key_fmt.

Yes, sounds reasonable.

-- 
Best Regards,
Artem Bityutskiy

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)