linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RFC/RFT 1/2] regulator: Fix da9052 ldo regulator names

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 14 Mar 2012 14:09:10 +0000
From:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
To:	Axel Lin <axel.lin@...il.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, David Dajun Chen <dchen@...semi.com>,
	Ashish Jangam <ashish.jangam@...tcummins.com>,
	"Ying-Chun Liu (PaulLiu)" <paul.liu@...aro.org>,
	Liam Girdwood <lrg@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC/RFT 1/2] regulator: Fix da9052 ldo regulator names

On Wed, Mar 07, 2012 at 07:42:50AM +0800, Axel Lin wrote:
> The regulator name for LDOs are LDO4 ... LDO13 in current implementation.
> The correct regulator name for LDOs should be LDO1 ... LDO10.

Can you please rebase this against -next?  I was going to apply but some
of your other fixes end up conflicting with this and the second change.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)