linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: Tree for Mar 14 (printk)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 15 Mar 2012 07:19:34 +1100
From:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>
Cc:	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Mar 14 (printk)

On Wed, 14 Mar 2012 08:56:22 -0700 Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net> wrote:
>
> on x86_64:
> 
> kernel/printk.c:1230:5: error: redefinition of 'printk_sched'
> include/linux/printk.h:136:5: note: previous definition of 'printk_sched' was here

Caused by commit 3ccf3e830615 ("printk/sched: Introduce special
printk_sched() for those awkward moments") from the tip tree.  The
declaration in include/linux/printk.h has alternatives determined by
CONFIG_PRINTK, but the definition in kernel/printk.c is not so
protected ...

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@...b.auug.org.au
\

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped