linux-kernel - Re: [resend][PATCH 1/3] mqueue: revert bump up DFLT

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 14 Mar 2012 14:38:32 -0700
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Doug Ledford <dledford@...hat.com>
Cc:	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...il.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
	Amerigo Wang <amwang@...hat.com>,
	"Serge E. Hallyn" <serue@...ibm.com>, Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>,
	"\"Eric W. Biederman\" (commit_signer:2/9=22%)" 
	<ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
	"Joe Korty (commit_signer:2/9=22%)" <joe.korty@...r.com>,
	"David Howells (commit_signer:2/9=22%)" <dhowells@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [resend][PATCH 1/3] mqueue: revert bump up DFLT_*MAX

On Wed, 14 Mar 2012 17:28:33 -0400
Doug Ledford <dledford@...hat.com> wrote:

> This has obviously fallen through the cracks.

It sure has.  Please dig out whatever is the currently favored
patchset, refresh, retest and resend, with changelogging which fully
covers the reasoning and decision process?

> so that if there are any apps out there that have been coded to expect
> this behavior, then there is a workaround path for them until they get
> coded

We'll be especially interested in the implications of this part.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/