[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20120314143832.286b497e.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2012 14:38:32 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Doug Ledford <dledford@...hat.com>
Cc: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
Amerigo Wang <amwang@...hat.com>,
"Serge E. Hallyn" <serue@...ibm.com>, Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>,
"\"Eric W. Biederman\" (commit_signer:2/9=22%)"
<ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
"Joe Korty (commit_signer:2/9=22%)" <joe.korty@...r.com>,
"David Howells (commit_signer:2/9=22%)" <dhowells@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [resend][PATCH 1/3] mqueue: revert bump up DFLT_*MAX
On Wed, 14 Mar 2012 17:28:33 -0400
Doug Ledford <dledford@...hat.com> wrote:
> This has obviously fallen through the cracks.
It sure has. Please dig out whatever is the currently favored
patchset, refresh, retest and resend, with changelogging which fully
covers the reasoning and decision process?
> so that if there are any apps out there that have been coded to expect
> this behavior, then there is a workaround path for them until they get
> coded
We'll be especially interested in the implications of this part.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists