[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4F61A3C6.8000607@bfs.de>
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2012 09:09:42 +0100
From: walter harms <wharms@....de>
To: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@...6.fr>
CC: Guan Xuetao <gxt@...c.pku.edu.cn>, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arch/unicore32/kernel/dma.c: eliminated unneeded free_irq
Am 15.03.2012 09:01, schrieb Julia Lawall:
> From: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@...6.fr>
>
> The device remains functional if the second request_irq fails, so the first
> one should not be freed.
>
> Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@...6.fr>
>
> ---
> diff --git a/arch/unicore32/kernel/dma.c b/arch/unicore32/kernel/dma.c
> index ae441bc..6184ff2 100644
> --- a/arch/unicore32/kernel/dma.c
> +++ b/arch/unicore32/kernel/dma.c
> @@ -172,8 +172,9 @@ int __init puv3_init_dma(void)
>
> ret = request_irq(IRQ_DMAERR, dma_err_handler, 0, "DMAERR", NULL);
> if (ret) {
> + /* the device remains function if this fails, so don't free
> + the previously allocated irq */
> printk(KERN_CRIT "Can't register IRQ for DMAERR\n");
> - free_irq(IRQ_DMA, "DMA");
> return ret;
> }
>
obviously we had the same idea ... i did not see that her it came in the moment i send my reply
sorry for the noise,
re,
wh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists