[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.02.1203151144280.2466@ionos>
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2012 12:02:49 +0100 (CET)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Akira Takeuchi <takeuchi.akr@...panasonic.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Carsten Emde <C.Emde@...dl.org>,
Manfred Spraul <manfred@...orfullife.com>
Subject: Re: [REGRESSION][PATCH] mqueue: Ignore the validity of abs_timeout
parameter when message can be performed immediately
On Wed, 14 Mar 2012, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> With the current code, checking the validity of the timeout falls out
> from what we do. I don't think we need to work around that, based on
> the POSIX wording. And if there are no applications that actually
> broke, I don't think we should care.
>
> Is there some other standard that says that you *have* to let crazy
> invalid values go?
Not that I'm aware of. Everything I found so far is copied from the
POSIX spec.
Thanks,
tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists