linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] watchdog: Make sure the watchdog thread gets CPU on loaded system

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1331827843.18960.197.camel@twins>
Date:	Thu, 15 Mar 2012 17:10:43 +0100
From:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:	Mandeep Singh Baines <msb@...omium.org>
Cc:	Don Zickus <dzickus@...hat.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] watchdog: Make sure the watchdog thread gets CPU on
 loaded system

On Thu, 2012-03-15 at 08:39 -0700, Mandeep Singh Baines wrote:
> Its a good tool for catching problems of scale. As we move to more and
> more cores you'll uncover bugs where data structures start to blow up.
> Hash tables get huge, when you have 100000s of processes or millions
> of
> TCP flows, or cgroups or namespace. That critical section (spinlock,
> spinlock_bh, or preempt_disable) that used to be OK might no longer
> be.

Or you run with the preempt latency tracer.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/