[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1331828329.4874.7.camel@edumazet-glaptop>
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2012 09:18:49 -0700
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Dennis1.Chen@....com,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
NeilBrown <neilb@...e.de>, Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@...y.org>,
Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/7] module: take rcu_read_lock_sched() for /proc read
On Thu, 2012-03-15 at 22:48 +0800, Cong Wang wrote:
> In the seq file operations, it still hold module_mutex for just reading
> the module list, switch to rcu_read_lock_sched() too.
>
Why is it needed ?
1) insmod/rmmod/lsmod is hardly in fast path.
2) after a mutex_lock(), a task is still preemptible
after rcu_read_lock_sched(), preemption is disabled
with NR_CPUS=4096, getting module refcounts is _very_ slow
RCU doesnt fit every workload.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists