linux-kernel - Re: Linux 3.0.24

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20120315162322.GA26005@foursquare.net>
Date:	Thu, 15 Mar 2012 12:23:22 -0400
From:	Chris Frey <cdfrey@...rsquare.net>
To:	Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Linux 3.0.24

On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 01:34:51PM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> I'm announcing the release of the 3.0.24 kernel.
> 
> All users of the 3.0 kernel series must upgrade.

Is the word "must" defined anywhere?  When I read it, it looks like there
are serious patches included in this release, perhaps data integrity or
security patches.  But "must" has been in an awful lot of these release
notes lately, that it makes me wonder if it is boilerplate.

Just curious how to interpret this.

Thanks,
- Chris

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/