[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120315175933.GB8705@sgi.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2012 12:59:33 -0500
From: Dimitri Sivanich <sivanich@....com>
To: Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
Cc: paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] rcu: Limit GP initialization to CPUs that have
been online
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 04:07:11AM +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-03-15 at 03:42 +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> > On Wed, 2012-03-14 at 09:56 -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> >
> > > Does the following work better? It does pass my fake-big-system tests
> > > (more testing in the works).
> >
> > Yup, tip booted fine. Thanks! I'll test, see if it gets upset.
>
> Wedged into 3.0 enterprise booted fine too, is now running rcutorture.
> I'll add hotplug after it runs explosion free for a while. Any
> suggestions for giving both virgin and 3.0 a thorough trouncing?
Mike,
Could I try your 3.0 enterprise patch?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists