[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4F61525D.2080404@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2012 23:22:21 -0300
From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...hat.com>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
CC: Linux Edac Mailing List <linux-edac@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] Add a per-dimm structure
Em 14-03-2012 20:32, Greg KH escreveu:
> On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 07:20:01PM -0300, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
>>> Easy rule to remember, never mix "raw" kobjects and 'struct device',
>>> which is what you would be doing here, right? We can handle many
>>> hundreds of thousands of files and devices in a single directory, no
>>> problem.
>>
>> No. They're all generated with raw kobjects, using kobject_init_and_add() or
>> sysfs_create_file() calls.
>
> Ick, no.
>
> Please, never use "raw" kobjects. Why doesn't 'struct device' work for
> you properly here? You just messed userspace all up in that it can not
> properly account for the parts of sysfs here in the device tree.
>
> Anything below /sys/devices/ should be using 'struct device' unless
> there is a _very_ good reason not to.
The raw kobjects logic is there since the beginning of the edac. I've no
idea why.
I remember a few years ago I tried to create a virtual class in order to
create the EDAC devices, in order to use struct devices, but the sysfs
nodes were created outside /sys/devices/system, breaking the ABI.
Not sure what changed on sysfs since then, but, on the time I looked
on it, I was unable to find an easy way to solve it.
So, I gave up and just kept it as-is.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists