linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] usb/ub: deprecate & schedule for removal the "Low Performance USB Block" driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 15 Mar 2012 21:05:57 +0100
From:	Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@...akpoint.cc>
To:	Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
Cc:	Pete Zaitcev <zaitcev@...hat.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] usb/ub: deprecate & schedule for removal the "Low
 Performance USB Block" driver

On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 04:03:02PM -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
> Pete wasn't talking about the phrase "holds various workarounds...".  
> Rather, he was referring to the phrase "does not use libusual".  That
> part is wrong; ub _does_ use libusual.

Okay, so I mixed up those two. "does not use libunsual" would be the correct
thing to day, right?

> Alan Stern

Sebastian
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/